User talk:212.104.155.43

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, 212-104-155-43.access.eclipse.net.uk (212.104.155.43), is registered to Kcom Group Limited, an Internet service provider through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Ownership of articles, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:06, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Really sorry you didn't like it, definitely wasn't meant to be vandalism, rather a considered building on an established theme - i.e. the Sphynx, as a form of Ownership phenomenon. I'll stick to my own articles in future, sorry! Accidentally wasn't logged in.(212.104.155.43 (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC))(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 20:38, 25 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Henry Brougham, 1st Baron Brougham and Vaux, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Patrolex (talk) 13:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copying within Wikipedia[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Devon heraldry into Draft:Norfolk heraldry. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norfolk heraldry (September 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norfolk heraldry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Norfolk heraldry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 212.104.155.43! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Salimfadhley (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page George Fermor, 2nd Earl of Pomfret has been reverted.
Your edit here to George Fermor, 2nd Earl of Pomfret was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/pomfret1721.htm) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Steward has been accepted[edit]

Mark Steward, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Otto Charles[edit]

Hi. Could you please tell me where you got the idea that Emperor Frederick II had a son called Henry Otto Charles? Surtsicna (talk) 01:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Surtsicna: Did I list the names in the wrong order? His name in Italian was Enrico Carlo Ottone (see e.g. Cinzia Tani, Lo stupore del mondo, p.392[1] (also what he goes by in Italian Wikipedia[2]). His name in German was Heinrich Karl Otto (German Wikipedia calls him "Heinrich (auch Carlotto oder Zarlotto genannt)" (see e.g. Kaiser Friedrich II. By Olaf B. Rader [3]). So in English: Henry Charles Otto. 212.104.155.43 (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the mistake is in making any kind of string. Tani is not a historian; what you cited here is a novel. Rader says that his original name was Carlotto, which appears to be an amalgamation of Charles and Otto, and that his name was later changed to Henry. I presume this happened at his baptism or confirmation. Frederick himself was originally called Constantine. If I understand all this correctly, his name was first Carlotto, then Henry, but never Charles Otto Henry or any other combination of these. Surtsicna (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I bow to your more learned analysis, it does seem to be the name by which he is known in common parlance in those two countries, perhaps not in academic literature. In that case I don't know if Wikipedia wants to make any mention of that situation or ignore it completely. I suspect you will favour the latter, that's fine with me. It just might be helpful to mention it, with caveat if required, so that all common variants of his name are at least mentioned. Perhaps the matter needs to be enquired into in more detail? Would you accept alternative and improved sources from German and Italian literature? Italian Wikipedia [4] explains the situation in detail, with what seems like a credible source, which perhaps needs viewing: Battezzato come Carlo Ottone, assunse quale primo nome Enrico per volere di Federico II. Lo stupor mundi prese tale decisione dopo la morte del maggiore dei suoi figli, per l'appunto Enrico, nato dal matrimonio con Costanza d'Aragona e macchiatosi di tradimento verso lo stesso Federico. A partire dal 1247, sempre per volere del padre, Carlo si fece chiamare esclusivamente Enrico, sebbene gli storiografi, onde evitare equivoci, lo ricordino come Enrico Carlotto.212.104.155.43 (talk) 16:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Norfolk heraldry[edit]

Hello, 212.104.155.43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Norfolk heraldry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Fade258. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, RT UK, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fade258 (talk) 16:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Norfolk heraldry[edit]

Hello, 212.104.155.43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Norfolk heraldry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Lobb (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG. Sources about him are sorely lacking.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Lobb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Henry Lobb, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Henry Lobb[edit]

Hello, 212.104.155.43. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Henry Lobb, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Your edit to Sudbourne has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:49, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Draft:Henry Lobb[edit]

Hello, 212.104.155.43. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Henry Lobb".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Thanks for contributing to the article Ragley Hall. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 11:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Seaman (Mayor of Norwich) has been accepted[edit]

Peter Seaman (Mayor of Norwich), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 15:48, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for block evasion (User:Lobsterthermidor).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SilkTork (talk) 15:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.