User talk:173.35.240.92

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Below Deck Mediterranean. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (173.35.240.92) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! ~mitch~ (talk) 18:22, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Please sign your contributions, and your point is dealt with further down. PatGallacher (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Olivia Palermo. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wasn't aware I did it multiple times just thought it looked better since she's a socialite first and foremost!

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks for your work on Kelly Cutrone. S0091 (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert - BLP

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:19, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Signing talk page comments

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Responding to your message

Hi IP! This is the first time since your message on my talk page I have been on Wikipedia so I do not want you think I ignored you. I have not dug into the details of the situation but it looks like maybe some progress is being made on the Kristin Cavallari talk page. Just be careful to only comment about the content, not the contributor. If you are frustrated, it might be best to walk away for a bit then come back. If you and Wally cannot come to an agreement, you can always seek a a third opinion. Other than this, I hope all is going well your way. S0091 (talk) 19:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks yeah hopefully I've sourced and reformatted enough that my edits won't be reverted anymore since I'm just a rando in Canada who is editing for fun not a paid employee of hers lol 173.35.240.92 (talk) 19:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

We are all randos! I mean who the heck is S0091 lol. I will say, though, paid editing is a big problem around here and not that I think you are paid but because it is a problem suspicions are raised at what anyone on the street would think is innocuous. However if you been around here for a while, you do become quite sensitive about it. I am guilty of that for sure and to be to super honest, I did have suspicions about you with Kelly Cutrone but I seen what other COI/paid editors tried to do on that article and you did not fit that mold. Anyway, best advice I can give is to not take it personally. S0091 (talk) 20:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes yes I'm well aware of this you keep on censoring to protect Meghan Markle! She's good at getting her minions to do her bidding for her! <3<3<3 173.35.240.92 (talk) 22:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. It's also inappropriate to compare living people (especially those who have a history of taking legal action) to Nazi criminals. DrKay (talk) 08:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Is that a litigious threat lol my family was directly impacted by the Nazis so I know what propaganda looks like and I will call Meghan Markle what I want thank you

If the claim that your family was impacted by the Nazis is true, then perhaps you should take greater care than to compare a mixed-race woman with a Jewish ex-husband to a Nazi? DrKay (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Oh my god you know absolutely NOTHING if you think that black people can't be racist.

I never said anything like that, but I'm surprised you think she is racist. I see no evidence of her being so. DrKay (talk) 18:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Erasing your own ethnicity as much as possible through plastic surgery and hair straightening/wigs, and inciting racial tension counts as racism to me. But that's all I'm going to contribute. My New Year's resolution is to ignore Meghan Markle for the rest of her sad existence like she claims she wants from the world.

February 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Talk:Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex) for a period of 1 year for repeatedly using talk pages as a discussion forum, and repeatedly adding contentious information about living persons.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

---