User talk:100 lion

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 100 lion. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Bfpage |leave a message 20:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Star India[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Star India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

100 lion, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi 100 lion! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This content belongs on your main user page, as it seems to be about your Wikipedia activities. It is obviously not a draft article so AFC is not interested in reviewing it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:100 lion/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The previous reviewer told you that this was a user page draft, not an encyclopedic draft. Resubmitting it without change is tendentious. If you need help with a user page, ask for help at the Teahouse rather than just pushing a draft against advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:100 lion/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not try to push drafts through AFC that are not encyclopedic drafts. Please ask for advice instead. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, 100 lion. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Bfpage |leave a message 20:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your draft article, User:100 lion/sandbox[edit]

Hello, 100 lion. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 21:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]