User:Jw686/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ultrasound-Enhanced Chemiluminescence[edit]

Different from fluorescence, rather than being excited by a light source, chemiluminescence emits light through a chemical reaction. Chemiluminescence can be defined as the phenomenon in which chemical reactions emit light. During the process, the vibronically excited product of an exoergic reaction relaxes to its ground state with the emission of photons.[1] Since excitation light is not required for chemiluminescence, problems caused by light scattering or source instability are absent, and there is no concern about autofluorescence in the background, which can lead to highly sensitive deep tissue imaging.[2] Recently, many advances has been made in deep tissue optics regarding ultrasound modulated fluorescence and ultrasound switchable fluorescence. With the greate potential in medical imaging, ultrasound-enhanced chemiluminescence (UECL), as a second generation of chemiluminescence, has been developed, which overcomes several limitations of chemiluminescence in deep tissue imaging[3]. Utilizing ultrasound and chemiluminescence imaging techniques simultaneously helps accurately visualize the tissue of interest in dual imaging. Additionally, ultrasound can serve as an efficient tool to enhance the intensity of chemiluminescence by reducing light scattering while increasing spatial resolution[3].

Chemiluminescent Materials[edit]

Luminol[edit]

Chemiluminescence of luminol

5-amino-2,3-dihydrophthalazine-1,4-dione, which is known as luminol, exhibits strong chemiluminescent properties. Usually found as a solid or powder, luminol appears as a white to yellowish crystalline solid. It is soluble in water and relatively stable at room temperature without luminescence. Luminol must be activated with an oxidant to produce luminescence, hydroxide ions or hydrogen peroxide(H₂O₂) usually serve as activators. Laboratory settings often use potassium ferricyanide or potassium periodate for the catalyst. The catalyst can be the iron in hemoglobin in blood forensic detection while enzymes in biological systems can also serve as catalysts in tissue imaging. However, the quantum yield of luminol doesn’t exceed 1.5% in aqueous systems, and 5% in dimethyl-sulphoxide[4]. The peak wavelength of luminescence emission varies across different solvent environments. Specifically, in aqueous solutions, the peak wavelength of luminescence emission is measured at 425 nm[5].


Coelenterazine[edit]

Coelenterazine is derived from coelenterate[1]. It possesses a superoxide anion in its structure, which enables coelenterazine to give out chemiluminescence. Unlike luminol, coelenterazine does not require any catalyst to trigger luminescence[6]. Analogs of coelenterazine such as CLA (2-methyl-6-phenyl-3,7-dihydroimidazo[1,2 -a]pyrazin-3-one) and MCLA (2-methyl-6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3,7-dihydroimidazo [1,2-a]pyrazin-3-one) have been prepared and used in many research works[7][8][9]. In contrast to luminol, MCLA is cell impermeable and is more useful in the detection of superoxides outside the cell[9]. Moreover, coelenterazine and its analogs could be applied as prosthetic groups of various photoproteins like mnemiopsin, aequorin, and beroverin. Coelenterazine has been used often in cancer imaging. In recent works[10], coelenterazine is used to estimate the elevated levels of ROS produced by cancer cells. Coelentarizine are also used in the detection and imaging of chronic inflammation associated with inflammatory bowel disease[11].

Acridinium Esters[edit]

Acridinium esters are a class of compounds with an acridinium structure, which emit strong light signals in chemiluminescent reactions. They are commonly used in biomedical detection and analysis as luminophores or substrates in chemiluminescence assays. Acridinium does not require a catalyst to produce chemiluminescence. Hydrogen peroxide(H₂O₂) and a strong base are sufficient to cause acridinium esters to produce chemiluminescence[1]. Acridinium phenyl esters even display greater luminescence than simple acridinium alkyl esters[12]. Compared to other chemiluminescent materials, acridinium derivatives have the advantage of displaying quick light emission with simple chemical triggers[12]. The main disadvantage of acridinium (phenyl) esters is their instability in the aqueous medium as the ester bond that is present between the acridinium ring and the phenol undergoes hydrolysis[12][13].

Mechanism of UECL[edit]

A chief concern for chemiluminescence is that the scattering light increases the noise of the detection. Consider the redox reaction of H₂O₂: 

 H₂O₂→ OH⁻ + HO•

It can be inferred that, with the appearance of oxidizing agents in tissues, free HO• radical is also produced. One could locally increase the production of H₂O₂ or free HO• of the target tissue while reducing those in the nearby medium to increase signal-to-noise ratios. In a study conducted at 10–3 M luminol and 10–4 M H₂O₂[14] , it have proven that the intensity of sonochemiluminescence ISCL was linearly increased with the increase of ultrasound power up to 100W. It is proposed that water and oxygen molecules were freed and more local free radicals were created at the air-liquid interface of the bubbles cavitation caused by ultrasound. The process can be described by equations as: 

 H₂O₂ → OH⁻ + HO• 

 O₂ → 2O•

In further studies, it has been shown that focused ultrasound creates periodic compression and rarefaction of tissues, which can lead to the local refractive indices changes in tissues and allow less optical absorption and scattering[15] . One can also modulate the laser light with a different frequency of ultrasound. Tissues will oscillate with different ultrasound frequencies and subsequently produce harmonic interference with the laser[16] . Simultaneously, photon-photon interaction[17] will modulate the frequency of the transmitted laser, making the laser transverse deeper into tissues with less reflection.

Effects of Ultrasound on Chemiluminescent Signals[edit]

As discussed in Mechanism part, the intensity of sonochemiluminescence ISCL was correlated to free radical HO• concentration and is linearly proportional to the ultrasound power[14]. More interestingly, the effective distances are also strongly dependent on the alignment of ultrasound waves, which means that the more focused the delivered ultrasound, the less scattered the luminescent light would be, which therefore leads to a higher resolution. Although the mechanism behind this is still unclear, research has shown that temperature increases could enhance the sensitivity of chemiluminescence[18]. Possible reasons behind this might be the temperature of focal points was increased locally by the ultrasound. It is also reported that the chemiluminescent signals could be greatly enhanced with a distance of 2-8mm depending on the power of ultrasound. The proposed mechanism is that ultrasonication produces H₂O₂ that subsequently stabilizes the short-lived free radicals HO•[19].

Concerns[edit]

The major concern regarding ultrasound-enhanced chemiluminescence is the local heat generated by the ultrasound. Although the local heat could enhance the intensity and resolution of chemiluminescence images, producing heat beyond the endurance of cells can lead to tissue damage. To avoid the risks of overheating the tissues, the duration of exposure should be optimized. However, the primary cells in tissues are vulnerable to heat, and focused ultrasound-enhanced chemiluminescence has very limited ability to control local heat, there needs to be a detailed investigation into methods to overcome this limitation.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Dodeigne, C.; Thunus, L.; Lejeune, R. (March 2000). "Chemiluminescence as diagnostic tool. A review". Talanta. 51 (3): 415–439. doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(99)00294-5.
  2. ^ Yoon, Seokchan; Cheon, Seo Young; Park, Sangjun; Lee, Donghyun; Lee, Yeeun; Han, Seokyoung; Kim, Moonseok; Koo, Heebeom (October 2022). "Recent advances in optical imaging through deep tissue: imaging probes and techniques". Biomaterials Research. 26 (1): 57. doi:10.1186/s40824-022-00303-4.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  3. ^ a b Le, Duong; Dhamecha, Dinesh; Gonsalves, Andrea; Menon, Jyothy U (February 2020). "Ultrasound-Enhanced Chemiluminescence for Bioimaging". Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 8. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00025.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  4. ^ Roswell, David F.; White, Emil H. (1978). "The chemiluminescence of luminol and related hydrazides". Methods in Enzymology. Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence. Vol. 57. Academic Press. pp. 409–423. doi:10.1016/0076-6879(78)57038-9.
  5. ^ White, E. H.; Bursey, M. M. (March 1964). "Chemiluminescence of Luminol and Related Hydrazides: The Light Emission Step". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 86 (5): 941–942. doi:10.1021/ja01059a051.
  6. ^ Silva, R.; Agustini, B.; da Silva, A. L.; Frigeri, H. (2012). "Luminol in forensic science". Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity. 3: 172–177. doi:10.20873/jbb.uft.cemaf.v3n4.rogiskisilva.
  7. ^ Dubuisson, ML; Rees, JF; Marchand-Brynaert, J (October 2005). "Coelenterazine (marine bioluminescent substrate): a source of inspiration for the discovery of novel antioxidants". Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 31 (9): 827–849. doi:10.1080/03639040500271803.
  8. ^ Wang, J.; Xu, M.; Chen, M.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, G. (March 2012). "Study on sonodynamic activity of metallophthalocyanine sonosensitizers based on the sonochemiluminescence of MCLA". Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 19 (2): 237–242. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.06.021. PMID 21788060.
  9. ^ a b Diaz, JM; Plummer, S; Tomas, C; Alves-de-Souza, C (November 2018). "Production of extracellular superoxide and hydrogen peroxide by five marine species of harmful bloom-forming algae". Journal of Plankton Research. 40 (6): 667–677. doi:10.1093/plankt/fby043.
  10. ^ Bronsart, LL; Stokes, C; Contag, CH (April 2016). "Multimodality Imaging of Cancer Superoxide Anion Using the Small Molecule Coelenterazine". Molecular Imaging and Biology. 18 (2): 166–171. doi:10.1007/s11307-015-0896-7. PMID 26420297.
  11. ^ Bronsart, L; Nguyen, L; Habtezion, A; Contag, C (August 2016). "Reactive Oxygen Species Imaging in a Mouse Model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease". Molecular Imaging and Biology. 18 (4): 473–478. doi:10.1007/s11307-016-0934-0.
  12. ^ a b c Natrajan, A.; Sharpe, D.; Costello, J.; Jiang, Q. (November 15, 2010). "Enhanced immunoassay sensitivity using chemiluminescent acridinium esters with increased light output". Analytical Biochemistry. 406 (2): 204–213. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2010.07.025.
  13. ^ Brown, RC; Li, Z; Rutter, AJ; Mu, X; Weeks, OH; Smith, K; Weeks, I (January 21, 2009). "Development and application of a novel acridinium ester for use as a chemiluminescent emitter in nucleic acid hybridisation assays using chemiluminescence quenching". Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 7 (2): 386–394. doi:10.1039/b811947c.
  14. ^ a b McMurray, H. N.; Wilson, B. P. (May 1999). "Mechanistic and Spatial Study of Ultrasonically Induced Luminol Chemiluminescence". Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 103 (20): 3955–3962. doi:10.1021/jp984503r.
  15. ^ Li, J.; Wang, L. V. (March 2004). "Ultrasound-modulated optical computed tomography of biological tissues". Applied Physics Letters. 84 (9): 1597–1599. doi:10.1063/1.1651330.
  16. ^ Jarrett, C. W.; Caskey, C. F.; Gore, J. C. (August 2014). "Detection of a Novel Mechanism of Acousto-Optic Modulation of Incoherent Light". PLOS ONE. 9 (8): e104268. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104268.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  17. ^ Kempe, M.; Larionov, M.; Zaslavsky, D.; Genack, A. Z. (May 1997). "Acousto-optic tomography with multiply scattered light". Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 14 (5): 1151–1158. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.14.001151.
  18. ^ Aslan, K.; Malyn, SN; Geddes, CD (October 18, 2006). "Multicolor microwave-triggered metal-enhanced chemiluminescence". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 128 (41): 13372–13373. doi:10.1021/ja065571r. PMID 17031946.
  19. ^ Greenway, GM; Leelasattarathkul, T; Liawruangrath, S; Wheatley, RA; Youngvises, N (April 2006). "Ultrasound-enhanced flow injection chemiluminescence for determination of hydrogen peroxide". Analyst. 131 (4): 501–508. doi:10.1039/b513735g. PMID 16568166.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jw686/sandbox&oldid=1220525443"