User:DStrassmann/Feminist Economics and Public Policy

Course name

Feminist Economics and Public Policy

Institution

University of Chicago

Instructor

Diana Strassmann

Subject

Feminist Economics

Course dates

2015-03-26 – 2015-05-14

Approximate number of student editors

4

This seminar explores advances in feminist economics and the implications for public policy and laws in local and global communities. Drawing from feminist economics research, the seminar addresses the persistence of gender inequality in societies around the world and proposed policy solutions targeting such inequalities. Topics include gender relations and the organization of domestic and market work, violence against women, workplace and pay equality, gendered access to resources, education, and healthcare, and gender and property rights. Students will revise or create Wikipedia articles related to the course content. (Note: This assignment is limited to students who sign up to receive an extra course credit for the course.)

Table of deadlines

Assignment	Deadline	File Name	Points
1. Online Training / User Page	Thursday, April 9 (week 3)	Completion documented on course Wikipedia page	10
2. Topic Ideas and Using Sources	Friday, April 17 (week 4)	[LastName]WikiTopics.doc	20
3. Proposal	Friday, April 24 (week 5)	[LastName]WikiProposal.doc	100
4. WikiProject / Talk Contributions	Thursday, April 30 (week 6)	[LastName]WikiTalk.pdf	20
5. Initial Contributions to Wikipedia	Friday, May 8 (week 7)	[LastName]InitialContribution.pdf [LastName]InitialContributionDescription.pdf [LastName]Outline.doc	(part of final total)
6. Peer Review	Wednesday, May 13 (week 8)	[YourLastName]ReviewOf[AuthorLastName].doc	50
9. Final Contribution	Monday, May 18 for graduating students Friday, May 22 for others	[LastName]WikiFinalContribution.pdf [LastName]NarrativeReflection.pdf [LastName]FinalOutline.doc	300
Total:			500

Timeline

Wikipedia Assignment 1: Creating an Account & User Page

Assignment (due Thursday, April 9, 2015)

• Brochures to review/use for reference: Editing Wikipedia, Using talk pages, Evaluating Wikipedia, & Choosing an article

• Register for Wikipedia. Although users can create or edit entries without registering, registration provides users with more legitimacy. To create an account, look for the "Log In/Create Account" link in the upper right corner of this page. Click on the link and follow the directions listed to create your account. After you have created your username, you will be redirected to a page that states "Login successful."

• Complete the online training for students. During this training, you will make edits in a sandbox and learn the basic rules of Wikipedia.

• Click the "enroll" button on the top left of this course page, then verify you're enrolled by looking for your username in the table at the bottom of the page.

• Create a User page.

• To do this, make sure you're logged in then simply click on your newly created account name, which appears in red in the upper right hand corner of the Wikipedia interface. You will then be redirected to your user page, which should have a header that reads "User:<Your Username>".
• Click on the link towards the upper right hand corner of the Wikipedia interface which says "Create." After clicking on the “Create” link, you will be redirected to a page with a header that reads "Editing User:<Your Username>" with a large text box.
• In the large text box compose 2-3 sentences about yourself. You may for example, highlight your interests and some areas of Wikipedia to which you wish to contribute.
• Scroll below and click "Save Page." At this point the link containing your account name will change in color from red to blue indicating that a linked page now exists.

• Explore some topics related to the course to get a feel for how Wikipedia is organized. What areas seem to be missing? As you explore, make a mental note of articles that seem like good candidates for improvement

• Review pages 4-7 of the Evaluating Wikipedia brochure. This will give you a good, brief overview of what to look for in other articles, and what other people will look for in your own.

• Evaluate an existing Wikipedia article relevant to the course, and (optional) leave suggestions for improving it on the article's talk page.

• A few questions to consider:

• Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
• Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
• Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily slanted toward a particular position?
• Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
• Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
• Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

Wikipedia Assignment 2: Topic Ideas and Using Sources

Assignment (due Friday, April 17, 2015)

Choosing your topic is the earliest decision you need to make for this project. Careful selection of a workable topic will help you complete this assignment efficiently and make a valuable contribution.

1. Begin with the following activities:
   • Carefully review the document Contributing to Wikipedia: Overall Guidelines and Evaluation Criteria.
   • Add 1–2 sentences of new information, backed up with a citation to an appropriate source, to a Wikipedia article related to the course material.
   • Browse through Wikipedia and review examples of good or featured articles on topics related to the course
   • Read the Wikimedia handout Choosing an Article
   • Think carefully about possible topics that might interest you. You have the option of revising an existing entry, creating a new one, or some combination that may involve adding to one or more articles and creating a new entry. New articles are discouraged unless a clear parent article already exists that has been well developed.
2. Research and list 3 topics or articles on your Wikipedia user page that you will consider working on as your main project. Look at the talk pages of any existing topics for a sense of other contributors who are working on these topics and what they are doing. For each proposed topic:
   1. supply a few sentences to explain your interest and possible revisions;
   2. note whether you would like to rewrite/add to an existing entry, expand an existing stub, or create an entirely new entry;
   3. if you are proposing a new entry, describe the parent entry and its quality; and
   4. list at least ten new references to scholarly sources you would add in revising/creating the article.
   • Note: (You may include references to newspaper, magazine, website, and blog sources, but these will not count toward the required number of scholarly references. All references need to be presented as formal full citations (do not simply provide links). Rank the topics in your order of interest. If approved, one of these topics will become your final topic.
   • Note: Topic titles should not sound like research papers or contain an argument. Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, all articles should reflect points of view and facts that have already been published. Additionally, article titles with two topics connected with the word “and” are generally discouraged in Wikipedia.
   • Submit this information plus your username to the relevant assignment tab on Chalk by 9 pm Fri 17 April. For full credit, be sure your name appears on your document and the file you submit must be labeled as follows: [LastName] WikiTopics.docx
3. (Optional) Consider posting comments on the Talk pages of any articles you might consider revising (or on a related Talk if you are considering creating a new article). For instructions on posting to Talk pages, see Using talk pages.
4. (Optional) Check out the WikiProjects affiliated with articles that interest you and read what other contributors have suggested for new and revised entries. You can find the affiliated WikiProjects on the Talk page of an article. Consider posting a query on a WikiProject talk page, particularly if you are interested in starting a new article.

• Note: If a topic you might consider working on is controversial (for example, the article on Microcredit/Microfinance or Female Genital Mutilation), Wikipedia may restrict changes to the site or others may quickly reverse your changes. Highly trafficked pages may be changed by other users frequently, leaving it difficult for you to make a unique contribution. Additionally, if someone is actively curating the page, possibly preparing it for submission as a good or featured article, he or she may not welcome someone jumping in and making wholesale revisions. Please avoid such topics. Also avoid very broad topics, since these are difficult to research and cover comprehensively.

Wikipedia Assignment 3: Developing Your Proposal

Assignment (due Friday, April 23, 2015)

1. Overview
   • The proposal should be a typed plan (a minimum of 500-700 words, not including references, describing the work you propose to do. The proposal should not be a draft of your proposed new or revised article and should not contain paragraphs intended for your article.
   • The purpose of the proposal is to persuade readers of the merits of your planned changes or new article and it should demonstrate how your article will differ from or improve upon any existing or related articles. To receive full credit for your eventual overall Wiki contribution, you will need to create a substantial amount of new material, regardless of whether you are adding to and revising an existing article or creating a new one. The proposal, therefore, needs to clearly indicate the work you plan to contribute. You will need to do enough research to clearly explain (and not just list) your planned changes. Be sure to include all the required proposal components described below in sections 2 and 3.
   • The proposal should acknowledge and adhere to the standards required by Wikipedia for creating and updating articles. Be sure to carefully review the previously provided information, such as from the handout Guidelines and Criteria for Wikipedia and information on avoiding plagiarism.
2. Planning Your Proposal: Questions and Suggestions
   • In planning your proposal, consider the following questions and suggestions:
     • Carefully read the comments you received on your topic assignment, including suggestions of references, reconceptualizations of your topic, title, etc. If you’ve been told your topic is too broad (or too narrow), alter your plan as suggested. Overly broad topics are discouraged since these are difficult to research and cover comprehensively.
     • You will have the option of revising an existing entry, creating a new one, or some combination that may involve adding to one or more articles and creating a new entry. New entries are generally discouraged unless a clear parent entry already exists.
     • Issues to consider if you are considering creating a new article:
       • If your proposed topic does not have a clear parent topic that has been developed beyond a stub or start class article, you should instead develop or revise/expand the parent topic instead, which would generally be higher priority.
       • Post a query to one or more relevant project groups.
       • Find an active Wikipedian who has contributed to a related article or to the relevant project group, and seek out that person’s advice.
       • Prepare to be flexible in response to the feedback you receive.
     • Issues to consider in planning a revision to an existing article:
       • Are all parts of the existing entry clearly relevant to the topic?
       • Does the entry present any unsubstantiated opinion as though backed by legitimate research? Can you identify any parts of the entry that should either be removed or require further support through citations?
       • Does the existing entry present all of the legitimate, research-backed approaches to a particular issue?
       • Are there essential subtopics that are not discussed in the existing entry?
       • Rather than planning to provide missing citations, first consider whether your research would suggest emphasizing different points or an alternative structure, possibly deleting some of those unsupported claims.
       • Does the existing entry appropriately link to other Wikipedia sites? Are there any links that you could add?
     • Issues to consider for both new and revised articles:
       • Identify the relevant subtopics for your proposed contribution and all of the legitimate, research-backed approaches to the topic.
       • Narrow the number of subtopics that you will create. (If some important subtopics are beyond the scope of what you can realistically include, you can note additional subtopics meriting further development on the Talk page.)
       • Your proposal should acknowledge and adhere to the standards required by Wikipedia for creating and updating entries. Be sure to carefully review the previously provided information, such as from the handout Guidelines and Criteria for Wikipedia and information on avoiding plagiarism.
3. Writing your proposal
   • Your proposal should include the following items and use proper grammar, style, and organization:
     • Identify your topic. What is the name of the article (or articles) you plan to revise or create? [Note: avoid titles with the word “and,” which do not have a clear parent article or titles that sound like arguments or research paper titles.]
     • Explain why your topic needs to be revised, expanded, or added to Wikipedia. This explanation should be about the existing representation of the topic (or lack thereof) on Wikipedia and should not include paragraphs that would more appropriately go in the Wikipedia article. Include an argument for the relevance (“notability”) of this effort. Why should we care about this subject? What makes it interesting or important?
     • Compare the current article or your planned contribution with one or more specific Wikipedia articles you identify that have been assessed as B class, Good, or Featured and explain what would need to be done to bring the article to an improved status.
     • If you are planning to propose a new entry, please provide substantial justification for why this would be better rather than expanding/revising an existing entry, given that new sections added to existing entries tend to receive far more traffic than completely new entries. You will need to show that the relevant parent article is well developed.
     • All proposals should cover the concepts necessary to a critical understanding of the issues; related theoretical and policy debates, and a detailed analytical plan for the material you plan to add.
     • Describe the planned work, and include detailed explanations of what you will include in each section that you will be creating or revising. (If you plan to contribute to more than one article, be sure to explain what you will be contributing to each.) Include a substantive list of scholarly references expected to support each proposed section you will be contributing to your proposed new or revised entry. The references should be organized by parts of your proposed outline, with references intended for each major topic labeled as such. Please include as a separate section from the tracked changed outline described below. Note that you should provide a minimum of two (and preferably more) scholarly references for each section you plan to add. References from news sources are permitted but these are not a substitute for the minimum number of scholarly references per section.
       • Note: References should include material from outside the syllabus as well as relevant course readings. These will need to be listed following an appropriate documentation format such as legal or Chicago style (including author, year, and page number). You may also use the APA style or the citation style preferred by the main umbrella Project Group for your contribution. MLA and other styles that do not emphasize the use of inline citations with publication dates should not be used. Note that once you start adding to specific articles, you should adhere to the referencing style preferred by the main related Wiki Project Group.
     • Describe (i) the links to other entries that you plan to add, and (ii) links you will add from those pages to yours. To what existing Wikipedia pages will you add information about your page to increase traffic?
     • If you anticipate any potential difficulties, please describe these.
     • Provide a detailed outline of the sections you will be revising/creating for your entry. If you are creating a new entry, this will comprise all the sections of the entry. If you are contributing to an existing entry, include an outline that shows existing sections to be kept or deleted and proposed new sections, clearly distinguishing between the two
4. Submit to Chalk: Deadline: Fri, Apr 24
   • Submit your completed proposal to the relevant assignment tab on Chalk. For full credit, the file you submit must also contain the following features:
     • File name: [LastName] WikiProposal.doc
     • Document must include:
       • your name
       • page numbers
       • be doubled-spaced (except the outline, which may be single-spaced)
       • be carefully proofread

Wikipedia Assignment 4: Communicating with the Wikipedia Community and Initial Drafting

Assignment (due Thursday, April 30, 2015)

1. Course and User page
   • Once your topic is approved, add a link to your topic to the class’s course page. Remove other proposed topics from your user page, unless you plan to work on them at some future date.
2. Talk and Sandbox contributions
   • If you plan to revise or expand an existing Wikipedia article, post a description, a detailed outline, and the rationale for your proposed changes for community feedback on the Talk page of the article. Make sure you have logged into Wikipedia before making any postings! Check back on the talk page often and engage with any responses.
   • Mark the article's talk page with a banner to let other editors know you're working on it. To add the banner, add this code in the top section of the talk page:
   • {{course assignment | course = User:DStrassmann/Feminist Economics and Public Policy | term = Spring 2015 }}
   • If you are creating a new article, write a 3–4 paragraph summary version of your article—with citations—in your Wikipedia sandbox. Then post on the Talk page of the parent article to your topic or to another one that is closely related to your topic, along with a brief summary of your plans and directing readers to your sandbox.
3. Bibliography
   • Compile a bibliography of relevant, reliable sources and post it to the Talk page of the article you are working on. Begin reading the sources. Make sure to check in on the talk page (or watchlist) to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography. If you are creating a new article, post these in your sandbox and keep them there until you have moved your article to the main Wikipedia space.
4. Research
   • Continue research in preparation for expanding your article.
5. Submit to Chalk: Deadline: Thursday, April 30
   • Submit a list of links to the places where you have contributed along with your name and username to the relevant assignment tab on Chalk by 9 pm Fri 17 April.
   • Label your file as follows: [LastName] WikiTalk.docx

• Talk Page postings: Info and How to’s
  • The Using Talk Pages brochure provides an overview of talk pages and how to use them. More detailed guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines.
  • Click on the “Talk” tab in the upper-left hand corner of the Wiki interface. Read what other users have already said concerning content on that page and note any concerns and comments they have expressed.
  • Click “Edit” to add your Talk contribution
  • To add a new discussion post you will need to create a heading of the form:

    ==Your Heading Here==

  • Place your post at the bottom of the discussion page and be sure to sign it by typing 4 tildes ~~~~ and click “Save page”

Wikipedia Assignment 5: Initial Contribution

Assignment (due Friday, May 8, 2015)

• The next step in creating your Wikipedia contribution is to begin writing directly for Wikipedia. Your initial contribution should be a minimum of 700 words, not including references, but note that if it appears you are using language designed to increase word count, your edits will likely be reverted.

1. Review advice
   • First, carefully consider the suggestions you have been given, both to your proposal when it was reviewed and graded, and any responses by Wikipedia editors to your contributions to Project and/or Talk pages. As you write, be sure to continually check the article’s Talk page and any WikiProject Talk pages you have contributed to for user feedback and suggestions.
2. Review information
   • Review the various informational documents and links you have been given, particularly those relating to citations and avoiding plagiarism.
3. Begin writing!
   • Wikipedia has a visual editor that is currently in beta. To use this, you first have to enable it in your preferences under the "Beta" tab. (Don’t forget to log on to Wikipedia first!) Then when you visit an article you will see an option to "edit source" as you normally would or simply "edit" which will start the visual editor. For making changes using the traditional Wiki markup format, review the tips given on the handout Editing Wikipedia
   • When you begin contributing to the entry directly in Wikipedia’s mainspace, your changes will “go live” as soon as you hit save. You can preview them, however, before saving. An alternative is to begin drafting your contribution in your Sandbox.
4. Should you start writing in your Sandbox?
   • As previously noted, if you are creating a new article, it is best to start work in the Sandbox, so that you do not risk having the entry deleted before you have had a chance to provide references. Read the handout Moving out of your sandbox for advice on how and when to move your new article to the Wikipedia mainspace.
   • More generally, drafting in the Sandbox is not an appropriate option for revising articles, particularly if the article receives regular edits from others. In such cases, other editors may be making changes to the article while you are working, and you should not paste large sections of your new work over recent changes made by others. Therefore, for contributing revisions to existing articles, best to start creating changes in the Wikipedia Mainspace. Overwriting entire articles or large sections is more acceptable for articles that are not actively being edited by other Wikipedians (no substantive new edits in several months). If you plan substantial deletions and overwriting to an existing page, be sure that you have explained the problems with the current page and your planned revisions on the article's Talk page and that you have given other Wikipedians time to respond.
5. New article tips
   • For new articles, consider using Wikipedia’s Article Wizard. The Wizard is a tool designed to help users creating articles for the first time. The Wizard is a six-step process that will ensure that you are ready to create a new article.
   • The easiest way to post a new article on the Wikipedia Mainspace is to log into your account and then type in the name of your topic into the search box on the upper right-hand side of the page. If no article exists, you will be prompted to create one. Be sure to search for similar topics as well as articles about broader ideas that may already cover the topic you want to write about.
   • Do NOT simply copy and paste your text from your sandbox to the article or there will be no record of your work history. Follow these instructions for how to move your work.
   • When changes are complete, press the “Save page” button.
   • Be sure to include your citations and references when you create your article or it may be deleted swiftly.
   • Once you’ve moved your new article to the mainspace, be sure to mark the article's talk page with the course banner. Add this code in the top section of the talk page:
   • {{course assignment | course = User:DStrassmann/Feminist Economics and Public Policy | term = Spring 2015 }}
   • If your contribution disappears, first, don’t panic and also don’t try to force your contribution back on
   • Check to see if there is an explanation of the edit on the article's talk page. If not, (politely) ask why it was removed.
   • Contact one of our online volunteers and let them know and also let me know
6. Revised article tips
   • Click the edit tab on the page you wish to revise. This will bring you to a new page with a text box containing the editable text of the current page. You can edit the text of the current article. If you are making many small edits, save after each edit before you make the next one.
   • Do NOT paste over the entire existing article, or large sections of the existing article. When changes are complete, press the “Save page” button. (Be sure to provide a brief explanation of each change in the space provided.)
7. General tips
   • Your article should include a number of short sections (many of which you may have included in your proposal). Headings allow a reader to jump around and find the information they want easily. (When you include a heading, a table of contents will be automatically generated when you post to Wikipedia.) Wikipedia allows the creation of article headings with relative ease. Be sure that every assertion in your article is supported with a citation (and carefully review the information on citations referenced above). In-text citations that include the name of the scholar making the claim are generally superior to simple footnotes.
   • To easily create citations, click on the word “Cite” at the top of the editing box. It will give you a drop-down menu of citation templates for books, journals, websites, and news. You can select a template and it will give you a form with all of the needed fields, and will then format the information for you. If you name the references where the template says “Ref name,” you can re-use them later by clicking on “Named references” and selecting whichever one you want. You put {{Reflist}} under references for Wikipedia to auto-generate your reference list, and if you add a number like {{Reflist|3}}, it will split the references up into that many columns.
   • Include links in your article. The linking infrastructure is what helps users navigate to and discover new information and will prevent your article from being orphaned and therefore unread. To add a link, double-bracket the word. For example, Capabilities Approach would link to the capabilities approach page. A link to a page that doesn’t exist will appear red. (Some of these instructions may change with the new visual editor.)
   • Good Wikipedia articles contain illustrations that help explain the topic visually. Illustrating Wikipedia
   • Click the “watch” button for both the article and talk page for each article you contributed to. As before, be sure to continually check the article’s Talk page and any WikiProject Talk pages for user feedback and suggestions.
   • Getting help on Wikipedia: While the online volunteers are good sources of help and advice, there are lots of other ways to get quick help on Wikipedia. Review this handout for useful advice: How to get help. Additionally, there are live tutorials on a variety of topics, which you can find at Tips and Resources
8. Submission Instructions
   • The following items must be submitted to Chalk by Friday, May 8. Be sure your name appears on the document.
     1. A narrative description of the contributions you have made along with links to the page(s) you have created/changed. [LastName]InitialContributionDescription.pdf (or .doc/.docx)
     2. An outline of your article, showing with track changes the sections you have edited, deleted, or added. [LastName]InitialContributionOutline.pdf (or .doc/.docx)
     3. These documents must include:
        • your name
        • page numbers
        • be double-spaced (except the outline, which may be single-spaced
        • be carefully proofread

• Optional: Submitting a Did You Know hook to Wikipedia.
  • This optional assignment can help draw traffic to your page and increase the “hits” it receives. Only new articles or articles that have greatly increased the word count of a previously existing article are eligible. “Did you know” hooks must be submitted within 5 days of the creation of a new article or fivefold expansion (usually from a stub) of an existing article. Submitting a DYK hook requires that you engage with other Wikipedia editors in a discussion that will likely result in requests for improvement to the article.
  • To nominate your article, follow the instructions given in the handout: Did You Know process
  • Or you may read the full guide to Did You Know nominations at: WP:DYK
  • You may also review a quick guide at User:Rjanag/Quick DYK 2 for step-by-step on screen instructions.
    • Search Template talk:Did you know on Wikipedia. Click on “How to post a new nomination.”
    • Follow the on screen instructions in the yellow and orange form.
    • Create a nomination subpage.
    • Write the nomination using the DYK template Template:NewDYKnomination
      • You will need to write a good hook -- the “Did you know” fact for your article (see below for details). To write a good hook:
        1. Remember to begin the hook with "... that", to end it with a question mark, and to link the article title within the hook and make it bold.
        2. The hook should be fewer than 200 characters.
        3. The hook should refer to established facts.
        4. The hook should be neutral.
        5. The "Did you know?" fact must be mentioned in the article and cited with an inline citation since inline citations are used to support specific statements in an article. Many submissions fail to meet one or both of these criteria.
    • List the nomination page at "Template talk:Did you know" by finding the appropriate date and adding {{Did you know nominations/YOUR ARTICLE TITLE}} under the date of the article's creation or expansion.
    • Screen shot your completed nomination and submit to Chalk when completed with the file name [LastName]PagePromtion.doc/.jpeg/.pdf/etc (Did You Know hooks must be completed within 5 days of your contribution to the Wikipedia mainspace).

Wikipedia Assignment 6: Peer Review

Assignment (due Wednesday, May 13, 2015)

1. Sign up on the course page to review the work of two other students in the course, first checking to make sure that two students haven’t already signed up to review any of those articles.
2. Review "Evaluating Wikipedia" before reading the contributions of your peers.
3. Complete one copy of the Peer Review Rubric for each of the two students whose work you are reviewing. Read carefully through each entry, and comment on any aspects of the article that strike you as notable or meriting improvement. Pay attention as well to readability, sentence clarity, and referencing. Provide a detailed explanation for each score.
4. Please type your comments for each article you are reviewing onto a copy of the attached form. Be sure to note on the form the name of the person whose work you are reviewing, the reviewed article’s title, plus your name as the peer reviewer. Provide thoughtful and detailed comments that will help your peer group member improve their article. Constructive suggestions can only help your classmates.
   • Label each file with your name and that of person whose work you are reviewing as follows: [YourLastName]ReviewOf[AuthorLastName].doc (or .docx) eg SmithReviewofJones.docx
5. Add a summary of your comments on the Talk page of each article you are reviewing. Upload the files to the relevant assignment tab on Chalk (including a word doc noting where your talk page comments may be found) AND email the relevant, filled-out forms to each person whose work you have reviewed by noon on Wednesday, May 13.

Wikipedia Assignment 7: Final Contribution

Assignment (due Monday, May 18 for graduating students (Friday, May 22 for others))

• The last step for your Wikipedia contribution is to make any final revisions to your article and other contributions in response to feedback from classmates and Wikipedia users. Your expanded contribution should be a minimum of 800 words, not including references, but note that if it appears you are using language designed to increase word count, your edits will likely be reverted.

1. Review advice
   • Begin by carefully considering the suggestions you have received from your peer reviewers and any comments posted to your Project and Talk pages by other Wikipedia editors.
2. Respond to Talk and Project page feedback
   • As before, be sure to continually check the article(s) Talk page (s) and any WikiProject Talk pages you have contributed to for user feedback and suggestions, and respond as appropriate.
3. Revise your contribution
   • Revise your contribution(s) according to the advice you have received, following the same technical details as provided for previous assignments.
4. Double check permissions
   • Check to make sure you have the requisite permissions for any images or illustrations.
5. Create a complete narrative reflection
   • Create a complete narrative reflection of what you have contributed to Wikipedia over the course of the semester, including a description of the changes you made, how you responded to feedback, and an in depth reflection on the process and on your experiences. If your page has been changed or moved by other Wikipedia editors, include a description of those changes and your responses in your narrative. Your final narrative should also include information provided in the narratives submitted with Assignments 6 and 8. If your page(s) have been changed or moved by other Wikipedia editors, include a description of those changes and your responses in your final narrative.
6. Revise your outline
   • Provide a final version of the outline of your article and any contributions to other articles, showing with the track changes feature of Word all sections you have edited, deleted, or added.
7. Submission Instructions
   • Submit the following items to Chalk by Monday, May 18 for graduating students (Friday, May 22 for others)
     1. A narrative description of the contributions you have made along with links to the page(s) you have created/changed. [LastName]FinalContributionReflection.pdf (or .doc/.docx)
     2. An outline of your article, showing with track changes the sections you have edited, deleted, or added. [LastName]FinalContributionOutline.pdf (or .doc/.docx) These documents must include:
        • your name
        • page numbers
        • be double-spaced (except the outline, which may be single-spaced
        • be carefully proofread
     3. Optional: If relevant (see assignment 5), your good article nomination banner, entitled [LastName] GoodArticleNomination.pdf.