Template talk:Radiohead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconAlternative music Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Adding Godrich, Deamer and Donwood to an "Other Personnel" section[edit]

The same thing was done to the Queens of the Stone Age template, so that Hutch and Boneface (sound guy and artist respectively) were recognised for being part of the band without really being one of the members but still play a very important to the band's image and sound. Considering these three also fall under that category, I thought I might add it to the Radiohead one as well. Feel free to discuss it here, I'd like to hear what you guys think. TheBronzeMex (talk) 23:27, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an improvement to me. Popcornduff (talk) 23:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving "Lift" from "Other songs" to "Singles" category[edit]

"Lift" was released as a single. There is no reason as to why it should not be included with "I Promise" and "Man of War," which are already listed as singles here, especially since all three were released as singles at the same time to promote OKNOTOK. Branjsmith94 (talk) 03:18, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source for it being released as a single? You've claimed in this edit to Lift (Radiohead song) that it was released as a download at the same time as the video, yet I can't find any evidence for this other than this vague Discogs entry, which only appeared at the same time as you posted the above comment. There's another vague entry at Rate Your Music, but they also think (Ocean) Bloom is a single, so I'm not inclined to take them seriously. -- I need a name (talk) 14:44, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@I need a name: Thanks for raising that, . I don't remember a single release either but I had lazily assumed I'd just missed it... would be good to get confirmation. Popcornduff (talk) 14:46, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Branjsmith94 You're re-adding this continually with no source. Please stop edit warring and provide a source. I need a name, would you care to chip in? Popcornduff (talk) 03:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Popcornduff: I guess it would technically be considered a promotional single. Brandonjsmith94 (talk) 04:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding TKOL RMX8 as a release[edit]

This was, as the article for TKOL RMX 1234567 states, too late for the album. It was later released as a download only. Should it be added as a single, or in "Other Songs"? User:inzy 03:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's no point adding things that don't link anywhere useful - it would only link to TKOL RMX 1234567 as it isn't notable enough to get its own page. Popcornduff (talk) 03:40, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

year seperation[edit]

is there a specific reason the years are separated on the singles?? every other template i'm viewing for bands with large amounts of singles in their time, do not have a year change. any entire reasons about the difference?

also, with this many singles, wouldn't it be good to just group them by album if we're needing to group them? some of these songs with notability are here, and they would make album categories work well enough (at least, from what ive seen with artists that do have them.) [sorry if this sounds weird tonally, just suggesting, don't mean to be rude >:3] astral ▪️ he/him ▪️ >:3 17:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]