Template talk:Not verified in body/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Span capabilities
Sandbox of this template contains a version of this template based on template:fix-span, which allows highlighting the problematic content by including it into |text= parameter. Example usage may be seen at testcases page of this template. I'd like to implement these changes. Any comments? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- I am not generally in favor of adding span capabilities, but if other editors think it an improvement, who am I to hold progress back. Debresser (talk) 18:16, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Why are you generally not in favor of adding span capabilities? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Help request: Title says "lead", example says "(lead)"
Both forms work according to a test I just did, but which is the official form of the template? Is one a redirect to the other? If so, it should be added to the redirect section.
The second example (focusing on reason=) does not include "lead" or "(lead)" and should be corrected with the official form. Real-life limitations will probably prevent me from coming back here, so thanks in advance! — Geekdiva (talk) 08:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
