This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I don't have any issues about "see also" text and wikilinks in ANY navbox, because as long as it's useful or helpful in some way and related to the topic then they its fine by me, but at the same time I feel that navboxes should ONLY be added to articles which are the primary topic of the navbox. If the lesser-related wikilinks in a navbox don't have an extremely-close relationship to the primary subject matter of the navbox, then I feel that it shouldn't be included in those lesser articles, primarily to prevent articles from being flooded with lesser-related navboxes. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 21:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I fixed all of that? It's limited to the family and media appearances related to the company. Jhenderson777 21:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree with what you did, and I didn't mean this to be taken to mean anything negative by it. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 21:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What should this section be called? Phil Robertson is not an employee. He just owns half the company, selling the other half to his son Willie. Also Sadie surely gets money from being on the show, and from singing on the Christmas album. Perhaps just put them altogether as the Duck Commander family. I renamed it Owners or Employees for now. DreamFocus 22:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Duck Commander family" sounds fine to me. Jhenderson777 00:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that works. DreamFocus 22:55, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok good. I don't know about you...but the navbox doesn't seem to update itself on some articles when I see it. So I am going to have to purge some of them. Jhenderson777 02:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
