Template:Did you know nominations/Pepsi Number Fever

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Pepsi Number Fever

  • ... that the Pepsi Number Fever draw on May 25, 1992 was supposed to have a single 1 million peso winner, but more than 486,170 people found a winning bottle cap? Source 1: Some 486,170 holders of the non-winning 349 crowns availed of this offer, costing PCPPI an aggregate amount of P240 million. Source 2: On May 25 last year, the nightly news announced that anyone holding a bottle cap marked 349 had won up to 1 million pesos, about $40,000, tax-free. ... Instead of a single 1-million-peso winner, up to 800,000 bottle caps marked 349 had been printed.

Created by Jpatokal (talk). Self-nominated at 14:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC).

  • I'm not usually a reviewer, but I'm not sure whether or not this meets the expansion criteria. Most of the changes on 13 June were citations and the addition of an infobox. Other than that potential issue, I don't see any problems.
    5225C (talkcontributions) 23:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
  • This is nominated as a New article, not expansion, because the article was created from scratch on June 12. Jpatokal (talk) 03:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • My bad, I took seven days off the current date instead of the nomination date, so I only looked at edits after June 12. I should have been more careful when reading the nomination. There are no problems in that case and it's a very thorough article.
    5225C (talkcontributions) 05:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • @5225C: please provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. An optional Reviewer's Template is located above the edit window. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 11:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • The article meets all criteria for inclusion:
    New: The article was created 12 June and nominated the same day.
    Length: The article exceeds the 1500 character limit, it has about 2500.
    Cited hook: The hook is cited in-line in the article, in the second paragraph in the section entitled "Number 349".
    Policy: To the best of my knowledge, the article meets core policy such as notability and has no outstanding maintenance tags.
    QPQ: Done.
    5225C (talkcontributions) 23:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)