Template:Did you know nominations/List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by 97198 (talk) 12:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence[edit]
Jennifer Lawrence at the 83rd Academy Awards
- ... that in 2016, Jennifer Lawrence (pictured) became the youngest person to receive four Oscars nominations?
- ALT1:... that Jennifer Lawrence (pictured) is the youngest person to receive four Oscars nominations?
Created/expanded by Krish! (talk). Self-nominated at 06:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC).
DYK check results show that this article has not been created, expanded fivefold by Krish! within a week before nomination. Krish!, I thank you for all the efforts you have put into this article but I am afraid it does not meet the eligibility criteria for DYK at the moment. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 10:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Damn! I got busy with my exams after expanding it and I couldn't nominate it on time as it kind of slipped from my mind when my exams ended on Thursday. So, I nominated it on Friday only to find out I was out of time? Nothing can be done now? Krish | Talk 13:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Actually you never expanded it fivefold. The issue is not with the time. I am sorry but I don't think anything can be done now. Let's see what other editors have to say. I had to delete your signature above as it was somehow causing my post to disappear. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Agree with Sainsf. Unfortunately the version that was updated already had 6886 characters of prose before expansion. This version has 6146 characters so is clearly not a 5x expansion of prose to satisfy the 5x increase in prose for "newness" criteria of DYK so the article is ineligible.Cowlibob (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Actually you never expanded it fivefold. The issue is not with the time. I am sorry but I don't think anything can be done now. Let's see what other editors have to say. I had to delete your signature above as it was somehow causing my post to disappear. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
