Template:Did you know nominations/Leech collector

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:51, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Leech collector[edit]

I vant to suck your blood I vant to suck your blood too

Created/expanded by Violetriga (talk). Self nom at 14:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

  • I'm not really comfortable with the original and ALT1 hooks. Although they are eye-catching, the fact that one poet made a comparison between leech collecting and poetry doesn't mean it's a fact that they are similar. ALT2 doesn't have this concern and is still attention-grabbing. rʨanaɢ (talk) 14:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Age, length, sources, neutrality are fine. No copyvio or plagiarism. Squeezes by on close paraphrasing. Agree with Rjanag in preferring ALT2. Yomanganitalk 14:54, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
You owe a review of course, but I'm not taking the tick back now. Yomanganitalk 15:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
I now owe two reviews and at least a few doffs of the cap. violet/riga [talk] 15:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
violet/riga [talk] 15:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
I still prefer ALT2. It's hooky and accurate without giving too much away. Yomanganitalk 15:55, 2 September 2011 (UTC)