Template:Did you know nominations/Forglen House
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 12:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Forglen House[edit]
... that Forglen House (pictured) cost only £16,000 to build?
ALT1:... that Forglen House (pictured) is a "confection" with "romantic aspirations" poured into it?ALT2:... that Forglen House (pictured) has seen feudal leaders, attack, and death?- Reviewed: Indemnity Act 1717
Moved to mainspace by Sagaciousphil (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 12:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC).
detailed article on a wealth of good sources. Impressive image is free. Three hooks are all sourced, but I am not yet "hooked". The first lacks spirit, and its "only" gets relative when we look at the conversion rate. The last one is something that could be said about many older houses. Leaves #2, but please reword a bit: "a confection" is not too impressive without "Elizabethan Gothic", but I would go instead for "all the romantic aspirations of the early 19th century poured into it", --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:22, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, Gerda. I love the wording of the that quote too. I've put ALT4 incorporating it below and struck the others for clarity. SagaciousPhil - Chat 05:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- ALT3 ... that Forglen House (pictured) has "all the romantic aspirations of the early 19th century poured into it"?
as pictured! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, Gerda. I love the wording of the that quote too. I've put ALT4 incorporating it below and struck the others for clarity. SagaciousPhil - Chat 05:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
