Template:Did you know nominations/De bono mortis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 13:52, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

De bono mortis[edit]

Created by Drmies (talk). Self nominated at 02:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC).

  • Drmies, fantastic little article. You need a QPQ still (as you know) and there's a gaping hole in the article: how did the text get handed down to us? Are there any witness manuscripts, or was it reconstructed from oral tradition? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:19, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks Crisco. Yeah, after nap time. I filled in that blank a little bit: the short answer is yes, there is a copious textual tradition--the short edit was made, and it gives you the publication/edition history going back to Erasmus. Will that suffice for now? Drmies (talk) 18:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Excellent. Just waiting on that QPQ now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:23, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Reminder ping to Drmies: QPQ still pending, and should be completed soon. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • QPQ checks out. Article is new enough and long enough at the time of nomination. Article appears to be neutral, sourcing looks good. No copyvio or close paraphrasing found. Hook fact etc. are fine. Good to go! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)