Talk:Yoshinogari site

Japan: History High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 22:28, May 9, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the History task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

move page to Yoshinogari Ancient Ruins[edit]

Should we move this page to Yoshinogari Ancient Ruins? Is Yoshinogari solely means the ancient ruins in archaeology? --Jjok 21:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, you make an excellent point, Jjok. I guess that Yoshinogari is originally the name of a village or small administrative district. However, "Ancient Ruins" sounds unnatural to me. If we translate iseki, I guess it means archaeological site. How about moving to this: "Yoshinogari (archaeological site)". An alternative might be "Yoshinogari (national historic park)", but I am not sure about that one. What do you think? Mumun 00:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

brief retrieving results

Web Results 1 - 10 of about 11,300 for Yoshinogari site.[1]
Web Results 1 - 10 of about 925 for Yoshinogari ruins.[2]
Scholar All articles Recent articles Results 1 - 10 of about 36 for Yoshinogari site.[3]
Scholar All articles Recent articles Results 1 - 10 of about 12 for Yoshinogari ruins. (practically, 1)[4]

Yoshinogari site looks academic and common term though I am not familiar to Wikipedia:Naming conventions. I took Yoshinogari Ancient Ruins from wikimedia commons and it seems originated from the official site.[5] Google search results of Yoshinogari ruins also seems mostly Japanese sites including junior high history book.[6]--Jjok 04:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Again! We want to instill confidence in Wikipedia users that we know of what what we write. Therefore, leaning more toward professional terminilogy "Yoshinogari site" sounds good to me. I think 'Ancient Ruins' is a poor and unsuitable term -- I daresay sounds like non-native speaker English in poorly-edited tourism guidebooks (no insult intended). How about "Yoshinogari site" ?

^^ --Mumun 09:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshinogari was also fixed. Thank you for your edit.--Jjok 02:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

changed beginning of timeline[edit]

Based on the official park website, as well as the japanese wiki article, I changed 1989 to 1986. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.232.127.21 (talk) 05:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]