Talk:Wind gap (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Move of wind gap[edit]

As wind gap (geographical feature) is clearly the primary meaning; I propose to move this page to Wind gap (disambiguation) and rename wind gap (geographical feature) to wind gap, unless someone can produce is evidence to the contrary. --Bermicourt (talk) 11:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It should be moved to reflect this.Morgan Riley (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– See above. Wind gap is the primary meaning. All the others are spelt "windgap" except Wind Gap, Pennsylvania which is a small village and has a disambiguator already. Bermicourt (talk) 17:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: seems reasonable; note that Wind Gap (capital G) already redirects to the Pennsylvania village, with a redirect to this dab page, which situation seems satisfactory and should be left undisturbed. PamD 16:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, clearly WP:DIFFCAPS, not to mention the spacing difference. bd2412 T 17:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, primary meaning and sufficient disambiguation in the titles of the others as they are settlements. Morgan Riley (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems legit. It's not like we're deleting the disambiguation page. Easy support Red Slash 03:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.