Talk:Wild 9

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://archive.org/details/MEGAFAN_Vol_1_Issue_1/page/n177/mode/2up

Needs a rewrite[edit]

Ugh. Whoever wrote this article clearly doesn't understand how wikipedia works. Informal tones up the ass, a plot section that reads like a fanfic and has more words than a college graduate thesis, uninformative and inappropriate diction... come on, people, let's clean this up where we can. PsychoJosh (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up the page a little bit and rewrote the character summaries so they don't sound like they're taken from the game manual. --Pretz (talk) 06:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Ant423[reply]

Re-organising[edit]

Less of the story copied directly out of the instruction book, shorter revised version would be nice, and a few more pictures.

If I was to volenteer, would the original contributer(s) Allow me to condense the page? and explain more about the worlds (levels) and enemies?

And make it look less like it was copied right out of the instruction book?!--Fr3k3r 12:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent additions[edit]

I've got some concerns over the recent additions to the article. I worked hard at cleaning out all of the old WP:COPYVIO/unsourced content, and now very similar content is being re-added.

Much of the info being added about the characters sounds like its ripped right out of a manual or guidebook. That's not acceptable, its a copyright violation. Content should be provided with a reliable source and should be paraphrased.
Also, some parts have leftover "[6]" type things in text, suggesting it may have been ripped from a Wikia or something? Because they're not linking to actual sources. Its just literally that text.
Content should be written like an encyclopedia entry. Many of the recent changes refer to a "you" or talk very informally, like friends chatting or something. That's not how things are written here.
A well sourced review from GameSpot, a source considered reliable by consensus at where we determine if sources are usuable, keeps being removed without explanation.

This is why I keep removing the changes. Sergecross73 msg me 16:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]