Talk:Who's Your Caddy?

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lil Wayne[edit]

lil wayne only makes a cameo in this movie. he doesn't star. 24.99.172.205 07:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But he get top-billing anyway. --(trogga) 20:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well okay24.99.172.205 21:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Film name[edit]

I'm fairly sure it's a play on the phrase "who's your daddy?", but I don't know if this is important enough to add.

Additionally, I'm certainly glad that this provides even more negative publicity of North/South Carolina - because everyone here is definitely a backwoods racist, of course. Why couldn't they use Florida? They actually have more golf courses per square mile than people...Zchris87v

Parody/remake?[edit]

I'm reasonably sure that this is basically a remake of "caddyshack". Does anyone else see this and think that it should be mentioned?

Yes and no. --(trogga) 18:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, because it's not a remake of Caddyshack. Most critics are calling it a bad rippoff of Caddyshack however, and that's already mentioned in the article. Nemeses9 03:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section[edit]

I added the controversy section, not to fan any flames, but to hopefully stem the high amount of vandalism this article is receiving and to expand upon the article in regard to a subject that cannot be ignored. --Notneb82 19:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War[edit]

This page is turning into nothing more than an edit war. It was taged as a stub article to be expanded upon. People expand on it and someone does not like what most want to point out about this film. This film is indeed a controversal film and that subject needs to be addressed. Consistantly deleting edits and marking them as vandalism is not helping. If the neutrality of the edit is the problem, then mark it properly. Secondly, forums are a viable source material. The MLA directly addresses this here [1] scroll to the bottem of the page for a perfect example of a FORUM CITATION. Furthurmore please before jumping the undo button please use this discussion area to aid in the clean-up and development of this article. --Notneb82 00:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to Lawrence Olivier[edit]

Someone please edit the link (Lawrence Oliver) to the correct person.

The Laurence Olivier has been dead for some time now.

I also did a quick check on imdb and there seems to be no actor with that name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.74.38 (talk) 01:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gag name - vandalism?[edit]

Came across the article a few days ago, and I saw there was a name ‘Hugh Jass’ on the cast, which is a gag name meaning ‘huge a*s’. There has been no mention of a ‘Hugh Jass’ in any of the sources and the edit was unsourced - could that be vandalism? 82.6.170.127 (talk) 11:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]