Talk:White Rabbit (candy)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why isn't rice in the list of ingredients?[edit]

If they are wrapped with rice paper, why isnt rice in the ingredients list? I love them... but i hate "haw-haw" flakes (but i used to love them when i was younger)--x1987x 01:47, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Check 'History' section translation[edit]

I've translated the 'History' section from the current version of the Chinese article. Please help me check the translation, particularly the new flavours of the candy and the final ingredients list. —Goh wz 07:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

recent controversy (2007) about it containing formaldehyde[edit]

Could someone more knowledgeable create additional articles about these recent controversies?

BFAD implements Recall[edit]

The local distributer of White Rabbit agreed to the pull out.

--Florentino floro 06:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some links:

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/07/18/asia/AS-GEN-Philippines-China-Tainted-Food.php http://www.gmanews.tv/story/51298/Chewy-White-Rabbit-3-more-China-goods-laced-with-formalin http://www.gmanews.tv/story/51515/BFAD-hints-at-2nd-list-of-formalin-laced-food-items http://www.themercury.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=3938746 http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/Display_news.asp?section=World_News&subsection=Philippines+%26+South+Asia&month=July2007&file=World_News2007071872532.xml

Guan Shen Yuan, the manufacturer of White Rabbit Candy has denied Philippine claims that its White Rabbit Candy contains potentially cancer causing formaldehyde. The company said it immediately submitted samples to an internationally certified testing laboratory in Shanghai upon hearing the news Sunday and results have come back negative for formaldehyde. The statement also called the Philippines bureau extremely irresponsible for not confirming the authenticity of the products, saying White Rabbit's high name recognition had led to rampant faking of the product both within China and internationally. The Philippine side has not provided effective evidence, and Guan Shen Yuan will bring legal action over the damage caused to the White Rabbit brand. 70.231.145.141 06:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.pr-inside.com/chinese-candy-maker-denies-philippine-claims-r177051.htm

Thanks for the links; i used one of them to upgrade and cite the formaldehyde incident. catherine yronwode Catherineyronwode (talk) 23:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tainted with Melamine, 2008[edit]

This candy is being recalled due to it being tainted with melamine. CNA:"White Rabbit Creamy Candy" from China also tainted with melamine woonie (talk) 13:43, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i have written a sub-section with references on this incident. cat yronwode Catherineyronwode (talk) 23:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am holding these for possible use:
http://www.todayonline.com/articles/277653.asp
(quantity of candy an adult would have to consume to get sick)
(I have used this one. cat yronwode Catherineyronwode (talk) 08:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/newsdetail1.asp?storyID=145028
(difficulty of testing non-liquid foods for melamine)
http://www.theage.com.au/world/china-milk-firm-hid-complaints-20080923-4mip.html
(milk company hid complaints; White Rabbit has recalled the product)
cat yronwode Catherineyronwode (talk) 23:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A request to others working on this article: for the sake of consistency, please use the same inline cite template that has previously been established elsewhere on the page, including the "accessdate" function. If in doubt, copy any earlier "cite web" style inline citation on this page. Thank you very much, cat yronwode Catherineyronwode (talk) 08:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on White Rabbit (candy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]