Talk:WhiteLies.tv

Orphan Tag

The Orphan tag has been removed as this page is linked to from another page now.(67.36.137.214 (talk) 14:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC))

Here is the text from the tag: "This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it." It still qualifies as an orphan. Wperdue (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)wperdue

NPOV Tag

Please do not remove the NPOV tag. This article is not written from a neutral point of view. I would be happy to help give it a more neutral tone, but the tag needs to stay until then. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 20:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)wperdue

COI

The only other contributions from the creator of this entry are the other anti-smoking campaigns and the advertising agency that created them. Wperdue (talk) 01:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)wperdue

Yes, I wrote those articles. What is the COI for writing on public info? How can it be improved? Rsawrie (talk) 20:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Rsawrie

I was just going over your edit history and noticed that besides the actual campaigns, you had created/edited the entry on the advertising agency affiliated with the campaigns but had no other edits on Wikipedia. Usually, that indicates some association with the organization in question. I will assume good-faith however and remove the tag. Wperdue (talk) 21:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC)wperdue

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)