Talk:Weathervane effect
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 June 2006. The result of the discussion was keep in some form. Merge doesn't need AFD to decide. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Too minimal?[edit]
Although I was the one that tagged this as CSD, it could actually be a good article. The author just needs to add some references and a bit more detail. Right now, it is too minimal, less than what I consider (but that's not really important) minimal for a stub. An external link and / or citation would help a lot. We might let this one stand a little bit to give the author a chance to beef it up. It's not in the same category as a lot of the CSD I see....
Brian 17:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Btball
New version[edit]
As
1) Nothing seemed to have been going on here for quite a while
2) It was tagged for improvement or deletion
3) It was grossly inaccurate, both in content and reference content
I took the liberty to rewrite the article.
I also redirected weathercocking to this article.