This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I think a merge would benefit both articles--and I really don't see the point of having a separate articles for a section of a river. Drmies (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also believe that the article should be merged. It's too short and unimportant on its own, never mind that it is about a proposed renaming that, as far as can be gained from the article (the content really needs to be cleaned up a bit), never happened. -Winterwater (talk) 13:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. It appears the name Anduin Reach is not the official name.Octopet (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
