Talk:Voyager of the Seas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Waterline beam ?[edit]

What is a "waterline beam" ? --Xerces8 (talk) 12:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simply the width of the ship at the waterline. These days it can be quite a bit smaller than the maximum beam, because of overhanging features, such as spa baths. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.173.127 (talk) 04:36, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.ship-technology.com/projects/voyager/
    Triggered by \bship-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.ship-technology.com/
    Triggered by \bship-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MS Voyager of the Seas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MS Voyager of the Seas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:MS Symphony of the Seas which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent removal[edit]

@Lyndaship: Not sure if you want to mention that her port of call was moved in 2004. Your call - I know nothing about WP:SHIPS conventions, but I do know this info doesn't belong in the Bayonne article. epicgenius (talk) 21:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes I agree doesn't belong in Bayonne, it is relevant to Cape Liberty Cruise Port and it is included there. I'm dubious about including home port info on cruise ship articles as we always end up with an incomplete and sometimes incorrect article. The only source is usually company PR who announce that ships will move at some time in the future, someone adds that to the article, someone else changes the tense when its past leaving the cite intact which only says will but the company had changed its mind and it didn't happen. So often I see currently homeported in Miami cruising the Caribbean but when I look at the vessel tracking site I see the ship is off Alaska. Lyndaship (talk) 08:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lyndaship, thanks for the response. I guess we shouldn't put that source in, then. I only added the info to this article because I didn't see the Cape Liberty Cruise Port page earlier, but I see why including it here is incorrect as well. epicgenius (talk) 14:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2023[edit]

Voyager of the Seas has upgraded staterooms, new waterslides, an improved laser tag arena, and new places for children, teenagers, and even babies following a significant restoration in October 2019. (a first on this ship). The ship's lounges have all been refurbished, and the spa and fitness center have been updated as well. Additional amenities that are popular with passengers include big-ship features offered by the line, such as a movie screen by the pool, a surf simulator, and "virtual balconies" in interior staterooms. Cruisers praise the ship's spotless decks and friendly crew. With a capacity for up to 4,000 guests and 1,200 crew members, the ship delivers a crew-to-passenger ratio of around 1 to 3. Recent cruisers, however, have had conflicting opinions about the ship's cuisine. Choose from the main dining room for guests. And the buffet, as well as a number of fast food joints and specialized eateries. When you're not in your accommodation, you may take use of the ice skating rink, rock climbing wall, three pools, and six whirlpools. Adults can escape to the casino or one of the many pubs and clubs while children mingle with friends in the youth activities. Voyager of the Seas sails to the Caribbean, Canada, New England, and Latin America from Boston, San Juan, and Galveston, Texas. For more information on COVID-19 cruise ship health and safety, go to the CDC website. 2600:1700:8BA0:6000:1FB:FFB:FE57:6737 (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]