Talk:Vishal Vashishtha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject assesment[edit]

I've assessed this to C-class. The tone and the lead can be improved. For example. the lead section should summarise the rest of the article, not mention anything new and usually doesn't require citations. The tone and irrelevant non-encylopaedic details have to be addressed too. "He was a very shy child until class" etc and subjective statements like ", but his popularity among fans has proven to be phenomena..." should be avoided, see Peacock terms. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ugog Nizdast Hello sir, thank you for the assessment. I really appreciated it. Will work hard to improve the tone and the lead. Best regards Puchicatos (talk) 14:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BLP sources[edit]

I've noticed and support the removal of some rather controversial content with not supported by citations. See our WP:BLP policy. All BLP articles should be well-sourced, especially controversial information. We do not use gossip sites and websites like "Tellychakkar", "www.bollywoodlife.com.", "TellyTadka." etc sound like unreliable gossip sites to me. Stick the using regular news media please. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 04:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article tone tag[edit]

Quite frankly if that tag has to be addressed, a lot of content here which was recently added has to be trimmed. The "In the media" section is unneeded since having an article here implies notability. Excessive quotations from sources aren't needed. Also, removing the unreliable sources and the content which they support should be a first step. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For reference articles, see Wikipedia:Featured_articles#Media_biographies which have quite a bit of Indian actors which are Featured Articles; see how it's done there. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 04:29, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ugog Nizdast "In the media" I saw it in Priyanka Chopra's page, since her page is FA I did it in this page, but ya I agree with you all is need notability here so will delet it. As the unreliable source case, will delete it and find other source to added in the future. Thank you for the notice. Best regards.Puchicatos (talk) 07:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Political[edit]

Political दीनानाथ परमार (talk) 08:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

दीनानाथ परमार दीनानाथ परमार (talk) 08:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]