Talk:Violet ray
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Added public domain (pre-1923, US) photo of Virex manual cover[edit]
Added public domain (pre-1923, US) photo of Virex manual cover Violetwanda (talk) 02:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Undid a change[edit]
06/16/2011 Undid a change that was unnecessarily limiting and narrowed the scope of a definition without reference or citation. The new reference to some related modern devices called them BDSM electroplay toys. Changed this back to the broader category of sexual stimulation toys, as their stimulative use is not limited to pain or only to users involved in BDSM.
Violet wand devices are still widely used in science and in neon sign manufacture, sold in the USA as "Vacuum leak detectors" made by Electro Technic Products, sold by Fisher Sci. and . In chemistry we use them to detect pinhole leaks in vaccum system glassware, our department (U of Wash. Chem) has about ten of these. They're a convenient source of AC high voltage for glow-discharge power supplies (yale.edu PDF) The common brown bakelite unit enscribed "BD-10" is actually a copy of late 1930s "Violetta" violet-ray product of Bleadon-Dun company. 208.38.199.57 (talk) 00:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Electrotherapy[edit]
Far from electrotherapy being obsolete as the article states, it is very much still used. Diathermy is curent technology, and as I understand it Violet Ray machines are an old form of diathermy classed as long wave diathermy. 86.10.62.169 (talk) 23:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Violet ray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710181112/http://www.electrotherapymuseum.com/Articles/VioletRayMisconceptions.htm to http://www.electrotherapymuseum.com/Articles/VioletRayMisconceptions.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Now trending in Europe.[edit]
It looks like a company in Europe is marketing a violet ray device for skin and periodontal treatments.
I think while many of the vintage devices are rather rudimentary the more contemporary units sold to cosmetologists and this new device for dentists may have some value beyond quack medicine. It seems a shame to dismiss them out of hand because of danger and poor quality of historical units.
Idyllic press (talk) 18:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Law suit explainations[edit]
Why did the law suits happen? It doesn't say. What were the charges against violet ray machines? 75.174.93.59 (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC).
Potential and proved benefits/harms of the treatment[edit]
The article requires a section providing information and references as to efficacy/lack of efficacy or proof of efficacy of the device as well as the possible harmful effects of the procedure. 02 January 2023 14:00 UTC.