Talk:Verdun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old talk[edit]

I propose to move Verdun-sur-Meuse to Verdun, and Verdun to Verdun (disambiguation). Verdun in north-eastern France is IMO the best known Verdun by far (World War I, for instance), and the -sur-Meuse suffix is hardly ever used in real life. Markussep 29 June 2005 06:17 (UTC)

Done. Talrias (t | e | c) 11:14, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get a map showing its location?


What does "Verdun" = "Verodunum" mean? The *dunum = "town"... what does Vero mean? It is clearly a Celtic name, as famous Romans (ie, Romanized Gauls) had it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.68.244 (talk) 04:33, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

To answer my own question, according to these websites, it means "Over-Town", roughly "Up-town":

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=super- http://www.ceantar.org/Dicts/MB2/mb00.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.68.244 (talk) 05:04, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

Military overweight[edit]

I think at the moment this article is overweight on the WWI battle. It could do with a reduction of this material and an increase in material about the city. The French article provides a good model for this. Zargulon (talk) 15:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Verdun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology of events vs. inserted photo[edit]

Under the section 'Battle of Verdun,' in the WWI subsection, there is a picture identified as the aftermath of the German artillery bombardment. The picture is dated 1915, but the Germans didn't begin their bombardment until 1916 (this is also stated in the text: Feb. 2016). Can someone determine the veracity of the photo (i.e., is it, in fact, of Verdun? what is the correct date of the image? what is the specific location portrayed in the image?)? Jdevola (talk) 13:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Verdun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should be more than a byword anent Verdun not officially a part of France until 1648[edit]

English-speaking wikis seem not to like going into French annexation and expansionism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.191.127 (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas Psaume[edit]

Can any one explain what a "tuition free" school is meant to signify here? Literally it means a school which does no teaching which is not much of a school Spinney Hill (talk) 09:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Princerie[edit]

The "princerie" suggests the building was the home of a Prince. The word "prince" is spelt the same in English and French but the page refers to a "primicier." Is it correct or should this read "prince?" Spinney Hill (talk) 22:53, 26 June 2021 (UTC) I see according to https://educalingo.com/en/dic-fr/primicier there is a French word "primicier which may apply ut clarification from an expert on the subject would be useful. The name of the building does appear to be correct. Spinney Hill (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]