Talk:V on Shenton

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that V on Shenton be merged into UIC Building. V on Shenton is a new development on the same plot of land which UIC Building current sits on. Further more, unscrupulous real estate sales person have been using this page to advertise themselve. This page is supposedly created by one of them with no significant useful content. V on Shenton itself definitely can't justify as an article itself. Fsimplicity (talk) 21:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Both are essentially the same article. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠♠ ^(Talk) 16:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, for the time being. This is because V on Shenton is still just a proposal (see office tower and residential tower), while it seems the UIC building hasn't yet been demolished. However, when a building is demolished/destroyed its replacement sometimes does get a new article - eg. The Singer Building was demolished in 1968 and One Liberty Plaza built in its place; while 122 Leadenhall Street covers both the under construction Leadenhall Building and its predecessor (which was demolished from the bottom, up). Astronaut (talk) 18:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question. So am I understanding that this is, at this point, only a proposed development for the near future and not a completed project? That is what the sources seem to be saying. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 21:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]