Talk:Uyarndha Manithan

Uyarndha Manithan has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 22, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 16, 2015.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Tamil film Uyarndha Manithan was adapted from the 1966 Bengali film Uttar Purush?

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Uyarndha Manithan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 06:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

"The film's soundtrack and background score were composed by M. S. Viswanathan, while the lyrics for the film's" -you can remove both instances of "film's"

Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"with the release prints being 4,591 m (15,062 ft) long" -no need to mention in lede.

Done I followed the ledes of other GAs I had done but I have nevertheless removed it as per your suggestion. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be OK ro mention it in discussing production, but I think it looks a bit awkward to say it on release.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: I have written it in the production section. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 07:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was if there was a bit mentioning the production of the film in the lede you could mention it within that, but as there isn't don't worry.

Plot

"to retain any job that he gets selected" -awkward, try just "to retain a job".

Done written as "to retain any job". Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"teir love"

Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 07:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Raju throws Sathyamurthy out of Raju's house despite Sathyamurthy proclaiming his innocence. "- add comma after house.

Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 07:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Production

"a deicision" -typo :-)

Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 07:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I took care of the rest.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just added it to the GA film list after Thunderbirds Are Go LOL. who'd have thought!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Haha. Thank you once again for conducting the review. It was very swift and smooth as well. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 08:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you caught me at the right time on this, first thing in the morning, and in some of the past reviews I had a ton of FA reviews and peer reviews to do or was just really busy, hence the delay. Keep up the good work, let me know when you want another reviewed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Most definitely, Dr. Blofeld. Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 08:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]