This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
I closed the AfD for this article as the nominator had advocated a redirect (which is a variation of keep, as the article name and history are preserved). Any discvussion on whether this article should be redirected to its parent album should be conducted here Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 02:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am not convinced that was a valid non-admin closure. But regardless, per WP:NSONG, this non-charting song should redirect and there have been several attempts to do that following closure of the AfD. I am restoring the redirect per the guideline. I42 (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We should probably page-protect the redirect if it keeps being altered inappropriately. I think I was within the guidelines when I closed the AfD as non-admin closure, but if I wasn't then please indicate where I misinterpretted the guidelines. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My bad - I had misread WP:SK; criterion #1 clearly did apply and it was a good closure; apologies. For now I recommend keeping the article on our watchlists; page protection is probably not required. Supposesly the single will be released this month and PP will make legitimate recreation difficult if it charts. I42 (talk) 05:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
