Talk:Uan Muhuggiag

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Libya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libya.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Libya may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vb3347.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

I don't see how this article is related to Egypt rather than North Africa.Read3r 20:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can I be sure that this is true? Youtube does not count as a credible source.Prophetofreason (talk) 20:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tashwinat mummy[edit]

I replaced a couple of sentences in the section because they were a very close paraphrase of the source, here. The source itself is very weak for the the description of the mummy, as it is an obituary of a scientist (Ascenzi) who studied the mummy, and not a peer-reviewed article. The description of the mummy really needs to be cited to a better source, such one of those cited in the obituary, either Mori & Ascenzi. 1959. "La mummia infantile di Uan Muhuggiag: Osservazioni Antrolpologiche". Revista di Antropologia. 46:125-48, or Ascenzi. 1980. "The Infant Mummy of Uan Muhuggiag", in Cockburn & Cockburn. Mummies, Disease and Ancient Cultures. Cambridge University Press. Pp 224-226. - Donald Albury 03:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]