Talk:USS Valley Forge (CV-45)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

The article and the summary bar on the right give vastly different launch dates for this ship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.38.132.1 (talk) 16:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright warning[edit]

The inserted copyright warning indicates possible copyright violation due to copy and past from DANFS. However, DANFS is public domain, as noted at the bottom of the page, so why is the copyright notice there, especially since most other USN ship articles also heavily quote from DANFS? Brooksindy (talk) 03:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a common mistake for those tags to be placed. DANFS has been properly attributed per WP:FREECOPYING. --Dual Freq (talk) 23:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That was my mistake. I was working on another article last August and I drive-by tagged this one while linking, not recognizing at that moment the truth both of you have clearly expressed. My apologies both for drive-by tagging and for failing to recognize my error. BusterD (talk) 03:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on USS Valley Forge (CV-45). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]