Talk:Tourism in Montenegro

Montenegro Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blather[edit]

What does this mean? 'In 2005 820,000 tourists visited Montenegro, of which some 272,000 were from abroad.' WTF??!??

This page is an obvious cut and paste of a tourism brochure. I tried to remove it - but reprimanded by an automatic bot for vandalism. WTF???

Looks like spam.Dlohcierekim 02:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I get spanked like a naughty boy for pointing it out.

That's because Jimmy has perverts working under his nose that he doesn't see. Real sicko types. Hi there!

This is not cut-and-paste, but a genuine article! I also created the entire Montenegrin presentation on www.wikitravel.org. What's wrong with the article? I checked out tourism pages of Croatia, Albania, and meny more, just to follow the present pattern in creatin this article - what bother you?! Nije bitno... 21:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Genuine or not the article is badly written for an entry on an encyclopedia. It really does seem as if it were written to be a tourist brochure, a style that is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Its would be an okay article for Wikitravel but not for Wikipedia. The article needs to be more objective and factual. --Westee 10:49, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalaja.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Kalaja.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]