Talk:Toramana II

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Afghanistan

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of Yudhishthira (Huna king) into Toramana II[edit]

CLOSED

Close to VERY stale discussion. There should be no merging of these article(s) as per NO CONSENSUS. There are no Wikipedia policies that cover a merge or no merge situation noted here, as VERIFIABLE and NOTABILITY are better resolved by other mechanisms. Therefore, STATUS QUO prevails. There is no decision on whether this should go to AfD by this closer, but that may be a viable way forward. A merge discussion is fruitless at this time. Closed with prejudice against renominating for merge unless directed so by another project. In the meantime, there should be no problem with having the articles staying separate for now. Removing merge templates. Non-Administrative closure-- Regards, GenQuest ^"scribble" 21:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please check this discussion for arguments. There was a 2:1 consensus for merge but the opposing editor insists on "proper process."

P.S.: The original target has been, ahem, unilaterally redirected to our current target by the opposing editor; I guess, not much process at play. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya3 and पाटलिपुत्र: please note your opinions as participants to the previous discussion. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. (Copying my old comment from a year ago) Narendraditya Khinkhila (now Toramana II) already has a paragraph on the supposed Yudhishthira, and a couple more lines can certainly be added to it. There is no requirement that every king that ruled some part of India over its two-thousand year history, should have a dedicated page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (Friendly). I do not see any benefit in mixing up the two rulers: things are already complicated enough as they are. The two rulers have been deducted from two different kinds of sources (coinage for one, Kalhana for the other), so they might or might not be related, depending on the various theories. Better in my opinion to have each one in his proper place (page...), with his own own set of evidence and academic theories. No need (and no benefit) to mix things up really. पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.