This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 18 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hquesada22. Peer reviewers: Hquesada22.
I found the history part of the article bias. It was a bias as to why using and smoking tobacco is terrible,making Tobacco 21 campaign essential. I felt the article more so explaining and convincing what was bad about smoking rather than actual facts about Tobacco 21 campaign --Hquesada22 (talk) 05:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
The History of part could use more information on Preventing Tobacco Addiction Foundation.The history of the founders the nonprofit organization and their drive to create the nonprofit. And also the steps that led up to funding and making the Tobacco 21 campaign. --Hquesada22 (talk) 05:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
The mission statement focused more on the negativity of the use of tobacco and its causes and the effects, rather than the mission/vision of the end goal, and action done by Tobacco 21 campaign. --Hquesada22 (talk) 05:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bergmanucsd (talk • contribs) [reply]
Reads more like a propaganda piece than an encyclopedia article[edit]
When I first came across the page, it had no counter viewpoints whatsoever, which is insane and strange considering the minimum drinking age page has some. It did not list any 'science' outside of one study despite all of the studies and research against setting the limit at 21. Schwarbage (talk) 15:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 18 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hquesada22. Peer reviewers: Hquesada22.