Talk:Timeline of the release and transfer of Guantanamo Bay detainees

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconCorrection and Detention Facilities List‑class (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

rough work[edit]

Some references that might prove useful... Geo Swan (talk) 16:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Richard Serrano (October 24 2002). "US prepares to release detainees". The Age. Retrieved 2009-12-26. A spokesman at the Pakistani embassy in Washington, Asad Hayauddin, said his country had not been formally notified, but any Pakistani detainees would be treated like returning prisoners of war. "We vetted them once," he said, explaining that his country did not believe any of the Pakistanis at Guantanamo Bay were terrorists. "Nothing will happen to them now. They will be treated just like a PoW is treated. They will be debriefed, and then repatriated." {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • Katharine Q. Seelye (2002-12-23). "THREATS AND RESPONSES: THE DETAINEES; Some Guantánamo Prisoners Will Be Freed, Rumsfeld Says". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
  • Dave Moniz (2002-01-09). "Taliban, al-Qaeda prisoners may be sedated for trip". USA Today. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
  • Philip Delves Broughton (2002-01-24). "Transfer of prisoners suspended". The Telegraph. Retrieved 2009-12-26. The Pentagon denied that the decision was linked to complaints over the treatment of the prisoners. It said it was simply expanding its facilities to accommodate more Taliban and al-Qa'eda fighters. Military sources said the pause would not last for long. There are currently 158 detainees at the base, which until yesterday had room for only 160.
  • David Rohde (2002-10-29). "THREATS AND RESPONSES: THE DETAINEES; Afghans Freed from Guantánamo Speak of Heat and Isolation". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
  • "U.S. Moves Units to Cuba To Prepare Prison Site". Washington Post. 2002-01-07. p. A05. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
  • Phil Reeves (2002-10-30). "Why imprison us? We are just old men, say inmates of Guantanamo". The Independent. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
  • Tim McGirk, Kotka Miralam Daud Shah (2002-10-29). "A Letter from Guantanamo". Time magazine. Retrieved 2009-12-26. Azeem didn't know anyone in America. The envelope had a pretty stamp depicting Mt. McKinley, and an unusual return address: Detainee, JBC, 160 Camp X-Ray. Even more mysterious, the missive bore the name of Azeem's son, Issa Khan, given up for dead months ago by his family.
  • Greg Miller (2009-12-22). "Many Held at Guantanamo Not Likely Terrorists". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2009-12-26.

I restored some links[edit]

I restored some links in entries for individuals whose articles had been deleted.

These individuals were known by so many names. But they each have an unique ISN. Removing the ISN x for a captive is, in my opinion, a mistake. Even if an individual's article has been deleted we still want to be able to use the "what links here" feature to see which other articles talk about them. Geo Swan (talk) 19:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unexplained tag[edit]

User:Cresix left this tag in May. I think it is too vague to be helpful. I went to User talk:Cresix, to request they expand on their concerns on the talk page -- and found that they appear to have resigned not long after leaving the note.

After a reasonable period of time, if it remains unexplained, I think this tag should be removed. Geo Swan (talk) 11:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Geo Swan (talk) 19:59, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

identity confusion[edit]

Someone piped wikilinks to Placeholder name#Fnu Lnu. This is precisely why wikilinks to subsection heading should be banned from article space.

The article Placeholder name may once have had a subsection #Fnu Lnu. If so, someone else came along, and removed that subsection, or gave it a different name. The wikimedia software, as currently implemented, provides no warning to a contributor, when removing or changing a subsection heading will break a link.

I changed this to point to Fnu Lnu (JTF-GTMO) -- a redlink. Is this a likely article topic? Maybe -- when someone documents the dangerous identity confusion at Guantanamo, due to their laughable inability to distinguish between men with the same name. Geo Swan (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

rough work 2017[edit]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Geo Swan (talk • contribs) 18 January 2017 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Npr2017-01-17 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference MiamiHerald2017-01-17 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference MiamiHerald2017-01-17B was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Timeline_of_the_release_and_transfer_of_Guantanamo_Bay_detainees&oldid=1038007035"