Talk:Time Transfixed

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

Hey,

There's a mistake in the first section of this article.

"Though if you study the mirror the left candlestick's reflection appears as if it would appear behind the actual clock."

I believe that whoever added this aside actually meant the right candlestick.

92.24.251.12 (talk) 11:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed that sentence entirely, since it made little sense and was written poorly. Anndelion (talk) 21:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The intro contains these sentences: "He made this painting for his wife who died from a runaway train in London. She tripped over the tracks, soon being struck by the ongoing train." There is no reference, and the context makes it unclear whose wife is referred to. Aimzzz (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Locomotive[edit]

I have removed the reference to the locomotive being a Black 5 as it clearly isn't. Black 5s, with 6ft driving wheels, had no splashers ('mudguards')over the driving wheels, the locomotive in the painting does. It could be a Jubilee but I don't think so as the loco in the painting is too massive. It is not an original Royal Scot and nor could it be a rebuilt Scot as they weren't rebuilt until 1943 on. However the experimental loco Fury (based on a Royal Scot chassis)was rebuilt in 1935 and became 6170 British Legion. This was the precursor of the later rebuilds of the rest of the class. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Millend (talk • contribs) 18:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re the above - although it's self-evidently a 4-6-0, is there any evidence that it's an LMS locomotive? I've added a {{cn}} tag for the moment. Tevildo (talk) 13:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]