Talk:Themes in Minority Report

Themes in Minority Report has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 18, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA nom[edit]

This is a daughter article I created today. I have nominated it for GA (obviously). AaronY (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Themes in Minority Report/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wildroot (talk) 07:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 18, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Written in clear language, with good flow and article structure.

2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to appropriate sources.

3. Broad in coverage?: Yes, covers many aspects.

4. Neutral point of view?: Article indeed appears written with a neutral tone.

5. Article stability? Talk page history and dialogue seems fine.

6. Images?: Only one image used - fair use rationale on image page.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to AaronY, who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. Wildroot (talk) 07:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Literally zero mentions of Religion in this article? (besides the mere category at the bottom)[edit]

Seriously? How is there no one to quote about this in the article? Maybe I'll have to search on Google...

I'm also disappointed there's nothing about the theme of "seeing". "Can you see?" is repeated over and over again (along with variations), the glasses at the start, the man with the missing eyes, John's new eyes, and obviously seeing the future. Also, the problem of interpreting what is seen: they interpret the murder vision as an "echo", because that is what it looks like, the trust placed on the spider bots measurement method also fools the cops and allows John to evade detection, because they interpret the scan info as reality, and there's something similar to René Magritte's painting The Son of Man, when the balloons block the view so that the police don't see John and the precog.

I just re-watched this film after never seeing it for years and years, so it's not like I've put more work into reading the themes of this film than other people. Maybe I'm just more sensitive to these themes than other people? Well I guess I've seen that theme of "seeing" more obvious elsewhere, such as the film Exam, A Scanner Darkly, some people's philosophy writings (usually pomo). So maybe I just recognize it more easily.

But, ya, this movie and the movie A.I. have some religion themes! Very obvious I would think! BrianPansky (talk) 19:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Themes in Minority Report. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]