Talk:The Tenant

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: French

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.

copyvio[edit]

It appears that this version of the article was copied from IMDb, particularly trivia and goofs. I have made deletions accordingly. --Mathew5000 15:37, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 08:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Locataire.jpg[edit]

Image:Locataire.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Aparment trilogy" delusional themes[edit]

These lines in the article:

While the main character is clearly paranoid to some extent (as exemplified in the scene when he believes a neighbour is strangling him, when he is in fact shown strangling himself), this film does not entirely reveal whether everything takes place in his head or if the strange events happening around him exist at least partially, contrary to the previous entries in Polanski's "apartment trilogy."[2][3][4]

are not correct. in Repulsion, the girl is hallucinating much of the time. But in the second film of the "aparment trilogy" Rosemary's Baby, the situation is reversed. Rosemary is being manipulated to think that she is being delusional, but at the end, it is clear that she really is the victim of Satan worshippers, and that her baby is now the Devil's son. (And if any wise guy says that this is her "imagination" as well, then that would not square with the book, nor the fact that a sequel was made to that movie).

I have deleted that quote. Myles325a (talk) 09:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored this deletion; your interpretation of the material is incorrect. The material you quoted does not state that everything that happened in Rosemary's Baby is a delusion. Rather, it states that the two previous films conclusively showed whether or not all of the strange events were real or imagined. Grandpallama (talk) 18:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Monod link[edit]

The link to Jacques Monod (cafe owner) points to the wrong Jacques Monod (biologist, not actor). Apparently, there is no English wikipedia article on the actor Jacques Monod but only in German and French wikipedia. See http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Monod_%28Schauspieler%29 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.219.170.67 (talk) 22:59, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advertizing poster[edit]

There is an ominously recurring advertizing poster in the film that should be probably mentioned somewhere in the article. It has three identical men standing behind each other, indicating that each man is a recurrence in time or a copy of the man behind him, and its yellow caption reads something akin to "The eternal over-painting/painting-over" in French. It's an obvious reference to how the tenant becomes a recurring copy of the one who has lived before him in the same apartment (and that it's probably an eternally recurring cycle, like a curse), in a way that most likely inspired Kubrick to his 1980 adaptation of The Shining (more similarities to Kubrick's film exist, such as their heightened ambivalence as to whether the protagonist is turning insane or if there's actually something supernatural going on, a recurring theme in Polanski's apartment trilogy).

Also, I can imagine that the main reason for the film's bad reception at the time was Polanski's crossdressing act, and that's why Ebert considered it "an embarassment". Unfortunately, the Reception section is as painfully short and underbacked as the rest of the article. --80.187.106.89 (talk) 16:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources in Themes section[edit]

Yes, I know there are three sources (epinions.com and the two blogs Antagony & Ecstasy and L'avventura di Gwen) in that section that upon first look may appear fishy, but hear me out! All of them are linked as professional reviews from the film's IMDB entry, A&E has an official Online Film Critics Society badge on its site, and in her "About" section, L'avventura di Gwen says she holds a Master's Degree in Cinema Studies from Tisch School of the Arts, New York University. --80.187.106.89 (talk) 07:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Horror or thriller ?[edit]

According to this article, both, but according to IMDb and Allmovie only Thriller.--Ezzex (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's already in the article that this film's genre is hard to pin down. It's pretty much in the same category as its contemporaries Don't Look Now (1973), The Shining (1980), and Polanski's first entry from his Apartment Trilogy, Repulsion (1965). All these films are deliberately ambigious whether they're psychological thrillers or actual horror films. (At least they are on the screen. Polanski has made it clear in interviews that to him, Repulsion is definitely a super-natural horror film about an isolated non-human demon that only happens to look like a female human being and, being repulsed by (most) humans, is not meant to live among them, although it is unaware of its true nature.) --2003:71:4E6A:B439:253C:1E50:7697:367 (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]