Talk:The King's Speech/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Swarm X 08:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

Detailed comments follow this list.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    No "see also" section.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    No information on soundtrack or film score.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    One non-free image has incorrect licensing information.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass

Before it can be listed, there are some issues:

I nominated the other file for deletion from commons, and re-uploaded it to wikipedia with the correct licensing and rationale. Ktlynch (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's not much on the film's score or soundtrack. Nothing serious, but some information on these should be added to the article. Ktlynch (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • A 'see also' section should be added. Ktlynch (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll place the review on hold until these issues are resolved. Swarm X 09:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I've added a see also section with a stray link which didn't fit elsewhere, though I can't think of anything else that needs to be linked, I've put a bit of thought into wikifying the article properly. There's now a new section on the score. Music is not my strong suite, so if other editors over it and introduce some technical terms I'd be grateful. I'm off to justify the other film poster now. --Ktlynch (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nice job, couldn't have hoped for better. We've got ourselves a good article. Swarm X 13:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]