Talk:The Idiot (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Target[edit]

This page should go straight to Dostoevsky's novel. "The Idiot" doesn't mean "idiot", it means the phrase, "the idiot".

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: one page moved; the other is listed at non-controversial move requests. — æk ^Talk 01:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{movereq}}

The Idiot → The Idiot (disambiguation) — Per discussion at Talk:Idiot. The primary meaning of "The Idiot" is the Dostoevsky novel, and the current page should be an explicitly-named dab page. Tevildo (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Idiot (novel) → The Idiot

Support as nominator. Tevildo (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there is no discussion at Talk:Idiot that establishes that as the primary meaning, only offhanded comments. Personally, I think of Lars Von Trier's film and Akira Kurosawa's film first. 76.66.197.17 (talk) 04:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support: clear primary topic, the only other page titled "The Idiot" to get a substantial amount of views is the Iggy Pop album (I left out the von Trier film as that's not disambiguated). Sceptre ^(talk) 18:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The nom will need to point out the discussion at Talk:Idiot to which he refers, as I don't see it. Either way, though, I agree that the Dostoevsky novel is the primary target. ÷seresin 09:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The discussion was at Talk:Idiot#Requested_move. Station1 (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The Lars von Trier film is already at its title The Idiots, so there's no naming conflict with that. The Kurosawa film gets one-tenth the pageviews of the novel. I'm somewhat surprised the Iggy Pop album gets so many views, and perhaps deserves a mention in a hatnote if this is moved, but the novel still seems to be the primary topic. Station1 (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Primary use of the term—part of the Western Canon. Already discussed during the move of Idiot. — The Man in Question (in question) 01:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Dostoevsky's novel is most likely to be the primary target. stats.grok.se tool seems to support this. --Jubilee♫clipman 03:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.