Talk:The Geisha House

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:TheGeishaHouseDVDCover.jpg[edit]

Image:TheGeishaHouseDVDCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A geisha house is not a movie.[edit]

It's more like a house of ill repute in Japan. If all of Japan were one big geisha house, then they could invite the men inside, too, so that they could take care of their wives and children. A geisha house is a sort of military hospitality industry complex with female slaves, but the men (chikans) are enslaved, too, because they can't get any pussy unless they do what they're told. 198.145.196.71 (talk) 13:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: things get kind of crazy inside a geisha house with all that pussy and no men. 198.145.196.71 (talk) 13:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]