Talk:The Franz Kafka Videogame

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (12 participants)
Dancing Stage Max (3 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (nom)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Nuketown (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Kenshi (Mortal Kombat) (nom)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

@Spawnspawn: We seem to have a disagreement about the notability of the awards being listed under the Reception section of the article. These award outlets are not listed as reliable sources in Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources. Additionally, a simple list of awards is not representative of the total reception that the game has received. This misleading reception is probably worse than no reception section at all. What are your thoughts? Suitecake (talk) 18:52, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Suitecake: Some examples of the authority of Intel Level Up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framed_(video_game) , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tooth_and_Tail , etc. Authority of HMMA (Hollywood Music in Media Awards) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sing_(2016_American_film) , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_of_Stranger_Things , etc. Authority of IMGA (International Mobile Gaming Awards) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framed_(video_game) , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her_Story_(video_game) , etc. Spawnspawn

@Spawnspawn: Did some digging and it looks like the rule of thumb is: is the award notable enough to receive secondary (reliable) source coverage? With that, it looks like the listed awards are indeed notable enough. However, there's still a WP:WEIGHT issue in including a list of awards/nominations without some of the criticism the game received. I'll take a pass at this soon. Suitecake (talk) 20:29, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]