Talk:Templo Mayor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Number of sacrifices[edit]

From the article:

between 3,000 and 84,000 people were sacrificed over 4 days during its reconsecration

That's an awfully big range. I hope that's a typo. As is, it's fairly meaningless -- better to say "thousands." Cleduc 05:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The number 84,000 conflicts with 'Human sacrifice in Aztec culture' wiki page


The information about human sacrifice is more than doubtful, the subject has recently been opened up again. Until a decade ago scholars have unquestioningly accepted claims of the Spanish conquerers (both Cortes and Díaz indulge the "rivers of blood", while they themselves never witnessed one instance of sacrifice). Archaeologist Moctezuma rightly points out that no one ever found more than a handful of sacrifial victims on the precincts. Please verify with recent publications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.208.17.51 (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

10,000-84,000 apparently cited in this 2003 publication, which itself is cited in 'Human sacrifice' wiki page. The notion of at least some human sacrifice at this prominent site is consistent with the widely documented practice (including in codexes published by Aztec people themselves), and the complete omission of it from this page is staggering. At least address it as a controversy rather than simply erasing (aka censoring).
Hassig, Ross (2003). "El sacrificio y las guerras floridas". Arqueología Mexicana (63): 46–51. ISSN 0188-8218. 2601:600:C681:45C0:E71F:257E:A7BA:82B2 (talk) 05:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Correct Name and Translations[edit]

im kinda confused by the first line of the article. "Great Pyramid" in english translates as "Pirámide Mayor" in spanish. and "Templo Mayor" in spanish translates as "Great Temple". which one is correct, or are they both (due to different names by different people)? either way, the spanish name used isnt in italics as called for by the Manual of Style. and a translation isnt given. the way it reads right now, the article makes it seem to a non-spanish speaker that the second name in bold is a direct translation of the first. the spanish article calls it only the "Great Temple", but notes that its actually a "double temple", formed by a truncated pyramid. 4.230.168.252 02:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The temple was only 30 meters heigh, not 60

name in Aztek?[edit]

What was the name of the temple in Aztec? Should the article not be moved to that name instead of the Spanish name? Gryffindor (talk) 13:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Templo Mayor is the current name of the archaeological site, with associated museum. Since the temple is no longer standing I would have thought the Spanish name is appropriate, especially since that is what INAH uses to refer to the site. Many Mesoamerican archaeological sites use their modern names rather than the name they were originally known by, even when this is known (Tikal for example). Regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 13:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see. But what is (was) the native name of the temple? Gryffindor (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bizarrely, none of my sources give a name for the building as a whole (at least not one that I can locate quickly) but various books refer to Huitzilopochtli's half as Coatepec ("Serpent Hill") where the god was born and Tlaloc's half as Tonacatepetl, the mythical place where maize was stored by the gods. It is implied in one or two of my books that the building as a whole might have been referred to as Coatepec, but not stated outright. Regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 18:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Anthony Appleyard: Coatepec was a mythical location. Its true location, if there was one, is unknown. The various places called Coatepec, Coatepeque etc. are likely to be named after the mythical location, rather than being the original location. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 08:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Templo Mayor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:54, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Templo Mayor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Split?[edit]

Should there be separate articles for Templo Mayor and Templo Mayor Museum?

Spanish Wikipedia has es:Templo Mayor and es: Museo del Templo Mayor. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Eagle Sculpture[edit]

Just parking this link here as reference for anyone wishing to expand this article:

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/archaeologists-unearth-600-year-old-obsidian-eagle-mexico-180976894/?mc_cid=40668319e4&mc_eid=bdae36ca30 J. Van Meter (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wooden artifacts[edit]

Recently found wooden artifacts:UPDATED 21 JUNE, 2022 - 14:49 NATHAN FALDE "Mexican Archaeologists Find Over 2,500 Rare Wooden Aztec Artifacts!" in Ancient Origins, a blacklisted online magazine. This article seems legit, though. Let's discuss it on the spam white-list page. Kdammers (talk)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Templo_Mayor&oldid=1210654386"