Talk:Táncház

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles

WikiProject Dance To-do list:

To nominate at WP:FAC:
To improve to Featured standard:
To nominate as a Good article:
To expand: 18th century dance - 20th century ballet - Bolero - Choreography on Broadway - Dance education - English ballet - Indian classical dance - Italian ballet - List of dance companies - Meg Stuart - Opera ballet - Sasha Waltz - Scotch reel - Set dance - Physically integrated dance
To cleanup: Contra dance - Salsa (dance) - Dandiya - Lead and follow
To unbias:
To check for copyvios:
To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion
Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs
To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more
Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine
To create: Broadway dance - Country Western Dance International - Dance and cinema - Dance and society - German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - Xavier Le Roy - more
Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pronunciation guide[edit]

The reason I reverted the edits that changed the pronunciation to IPA is this: virtually nobody uses or understands that gobbledygook, apart from linguists. I certainly can't make heads nor tails of it. Wikipedia in no way requires IPA for pronunciation guides: there are many, many other pages with plain old, non-IPA, understandable examples. This is not a resource for linguists or other specialists who require that level of precision in describing pronunciation of foreign phrases. ==ILike2BeAnonymous 17:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It takes less than half a minute to look up the meaning of those symbols; what's more, some of them are self-evident. We can perhaps preserve an alternative way of transcription if you insist but I find it certainly odd (to say the least) to simply delete a piece of information that is relevant, useful and true. Adam78 17:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you restored the IPA but also left in the "common man's" version, I guess we can live with that. But really, who in the world, apart from a few pointy-headed scientist types, can even make the least bit of sense out of those weird characters? Let's face it: the vast majority of people are not going to gain anything from this, as it's definitely in the realm of specialized knowledge. How many amateur Henry Higginses are out there? Not many, I'd bet. ==ILike2BeAnonymous 17:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it's a viable approach. The aim of an encyclopedia is to spread knowledge, not to accommodate to the readers' knowledge by oversimplifying knowledge. If you find the article on IPA or its sounds too complicated, you can ask someone on their discussion pages to clarify them, but it's not the matter of this article. Einstein's words are usually paraphrased like this: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler." If the matter seems to be complicated, it's not the problem of the matter but the problem of the people who haven't made the effort to explain it properly. But simply stating "that's too complicated" – well, we could delete all Wikipedia, because the simplest thing is to walk on the fields and smell the scent of the flowers and sing and dance, to stay on-topic. :-) That's also good, but it's not what an encyclopedia is about. Adam78 16:51, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article says lots of things about Tanchaz (that it's an aspect of a folk revival, what it literally translates as, and that it draws authentically from several traditions) without actually defining it. Please rewrite the first sentence so it is an answer to the question, "What is Tanchaz?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.187.0.71 (talk) 03:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Táncház. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120120222036/http://www.passiondiscs.co.uk/articles/pal_havasreti_part_1.htm to http://www.passiondiscs.co.uk/articles/pal_havasreti_part_1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]