Talk:Street performing (U.S. case law)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hiding?[edit]

removed pov tag due to lack of explanation for its placement These are just legal cases. Why would anybody try to hide the laws regarding free speech and remove them from the article on busking? Why would they challenge such basic elementary concepts. The proof of these things are in the cases cited. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.115.155.123 (talkcontribs) 00:52, 1 October 2010

Please click and read WP:Assume good faith. The move was only due to article size (please click and read WP:SIZE). The words See Busking (U.S. case law) hide nothing. --Lexein (talk) 10:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BS lexein is a not a very good editor at all. He has an agenda. He was ready to remove one of the most succesful and famous buskers of all time from the busking article because he was to lazy to do a search. Type in the the words busk and laliberte into any search engine and you will come up with dozens possibly even hundreds of links to laliberte's busking exploits. The same for all the other super stars and information he eliminated. He removed the best vid on busking i have ever seen. He is a wiki troll out to shred this srticle and the laws. since the info on conspiracy against civil rights has totally disappeared he and his consorts are probably up to just such kind of illegal activities. Erasing knowledge isnt going to change the laws. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.65.109.44 (talk) 00:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There were also cases In New York City and Denver where lottery and judgmental permitting systems were found to be illegal. Does anybody have info on these cases? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.65.109.102 (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Clearly there is no bias here other than a bias toward rule of law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.199.252.64 (talk) 03:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Busking (U.S. case law). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:42, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Busking (U.S. case law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]