Talk:Strathberry

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Strathberry (talk · contribs)
Douglas McCaffrey (talk · contribs)
Douglas at Strathberry (talk · contribs)
Fionahunterwood (talk · contribs)
Nylonhello (talk · contribs)

"Scotland, UK"?[edit]

After what was getting near to being an edit war I consulted neutrally at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Scotland#.22Scotland.2C_UK.22.3F. The respondent advised using past consensus. This article has used "Scotland" without ", UK" from its creation in 2013 to the version of Sept 2016 before recent IP edits. I think this establishes a consensus, so please do not insert ", UK" again. Thanks. PamD 09:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone can show a Featured Article or even a Good Article on a Scottish or Welsh company, using {{Infobox company}}, then we can be guided by the form of country name used there. I can't find one, and my examples of similar entities have been rejected. PamD 09:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of articles of major Scottish companies using UK in the location: Bank of Scotland, Royal Bank of Scotland, Aggreko, Standard Life Aberdeen, SSE plc for example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.116.24 (talk) 17:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But unless any of them have been recognised as Featured or Good Articles, that's irrelevant. There are plenty of suboptimal articles in the encyclopedia. PamD 20:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. We're not addressing a letter, and I don't think there are any other Scotlands it could be confused with. – Joe (talk) 11:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Agree with User:PamD and Joe's point sums it up for me GlasgowBraveheart (talk) 19:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Founders?[edit]

I can't work out how best to incorporate this with the contradictory sourced info already in the article, but Companies house info has:

Company incorporated April 2012 with single director Guy James Hamilton Hundleby
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/SC421815/officers shows Claire Robertson was a director from 21 December 2012 and resigned on 28 February 2014
No sign of Leeanne as a director

PamD 15:28, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have multiple sources that describe both Robertson and Leeanne Hundleby as "founders", so I think including both is warranted. I was looking for a decent source to verify that Robertson resigned – I suppose companies house will do? – Joe (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]