This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parliamentary Procedure, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Parliamentary ProcedureWikipedia:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureTemplate:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureParliamentary Procedure articles
This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 5 October 2019. The result of the discussion was No clear deletion rational. Solid consensus that this is a misguided nomination..
Why is the entire rule reprinted here, rather than just a discussion thereof? --jpgordon::==( o ) 01:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've tagged this article with a {{Cleanup-jargon}} because its "legalese" is not suitable for an encyclopedia article. ~ Jeff Q(talk) 05:40, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Legalese" isn't the issue. We don't just reprint documents verbatim, that is what Wikisource is for. 151.197.217.190 (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Editors following this page may be interested in this RfC about the "nuclear option" for changing Senate rules/procedures. Mathew5000 (talk) 09:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]