St. Francis Xavier Church (Manhattan) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Just noting that Katie Holmes apparently goes to this church, reported in news media 129.180.157.162 (talk) 02:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And...? BMK (talk) 06:28, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relevance of alleged attendance of gay and lesbian parishioners[edit]
I don't see how it's relevant because somebody says that gay and lesbian parishioners like St. Francis Xavier. How is that relevant to a Catholic church if somebody says that gay and lesbian parishioners go to it? I don't think it is relevant. How exactly would you check that little piece of information? NapoleonX (talk) 01:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's already sourced to an article in the NY Times. If the Times found it significant, then it is. BMK (talk) 03:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
