Talk:Southport Courthouse

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Southport Courthouse article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Queensland / Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Southport Courthouse is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Photos[edit]

The photos are an exact representation of the actual courthouse, which is the subject of the article. --WikiCats 07:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That may be the case but the layout of the photos within the article is poor and the photo of the nameplate of the courthouse is totally irrelevant. I am of the opinion the Wikipedia should only have pictures of notable buildings otherwise it would get rather cluttered. I consider notable to mean old, famous, infamous, unique, newsworthy etc. I suspect that the picture in this article is none of these. At the very least the photo should be of the thumbnail style (ie with a frame and caption) and palced on the right hand side rather than left hand side. Alan Liefting 03:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The photographs were not downloaded from the internet. They was taken by myself on a particular day of the week to insure no traffic and a special time of day for optimum lighting. I spent considerable time photoshopping the image and formatting the page.

Do you have a guideline that say photographs that depict the subject of the article are not allowed? --WikiCats 14:33, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Alan Liefting. On a short article like this, a single thumbnail is sufficient. The nameplate is not relevant. The other pic isn't so great either. I've implemented as a thumb on the right per this new consensus. GlassFET 16:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User GlassFET is a sock puppet --WikiCats (talk) 11:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]