Talk:Southern University, Bangladesh

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladeshi Universities, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Bangladeshi UniversitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Bangladeshi UniversitiesTemplate:WikiProject Bangladeshi UniversitiesBangladeshi Universities articles

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Dispute[edit]

The article contains a lot of unlikely information, which is difficult to verify. It needs additional references for its verification. The reference section need to be improved. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 17:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which information is unlikely and cannot be verified? Unless there is a contrary opinion against a specific information on the article, there is no dispute. Arman ^(Talk) 01:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is (undoubtedly) informative. But the style, in my opinion, is not suitable for an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not meant to be a copy of the entire website of an institution. --Sabih 16:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Sublogofi (1).png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]