Talk:Sol Levi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSol Levi has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 11, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Sources[edit]

  • [1] Interview
  • [2] They say what they make of him before seeing him.
  • [3]
Thanks Mr Unsigned (aka RainTheOne), I've seen these before and there is nothing to add :-) –anemoneprojectors– 01:22, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind then, I'll add what I drew out of them soonish. There's always a way to snag an extra ref in.. I was going to sign when I'd finished. Let's take LastBroadcast to the board! You should use flavour mag for Asher.. dont worry I havent placed it on the talk page - We know what would happen then.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 01:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean that to sound asif, you'd say it can't be used btw, I meant the reviewer may pick fault.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 01:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you mean. –anemoneprojectors– 09:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Asher's actor did an interview in flavour magazine. If I linked it on the talk page, the reviewer would make you add it or call it an unreliable source.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 14:25, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is it a reliable source? Koko has been questioned on Asher's GAR but not Naz's... –anemoneprojectors– 16:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Number 1 urban magazine or something. You can buy it from the shop. I've taken Koko and Lastbraodcast to the reliable sources notice board.. I use lastbroadcast and I certainly think it is okay.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 16:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just looked, Flavour Mag is already used in Asher's article, in fact it's the first reference. –anemoneprojectors– 20:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah but many of the Koko facts are covered in other sources... –anemoneprojectors– 20:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see. It's best to check at the notice board as there is a chance you might be able to keep it, and another e20 actor else had a koko interview didn't they? I'm not letting Lastbroadcast be deemed unreliable though, I bloody need that website! :DRAIN*the*ONE BAM 21:13, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You probably shouldn't have taken it to the board then. :P - JuneGloom Talk 21:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I know but I have a feeling LB will pass. If not, I'll still use it.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 22:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How can an interview with an actor not be a reliable source? Even if the site isn't reliable in general, these things should be. Same as Walford Web, which I think has been discussed before. Yes another one does use Koko, I think it might be Stevie but I'm not sure. –anemoneprojectors– 22:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sol Levi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I found zero disambiguations. Well Done!

Linkrot: I found zero dead links. Well Done!

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose) : b (MoS) :
    One thing, the lead is a bit messy maybe split it into two paragrpahs and maybe add a caption for the picture?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All references are fine and no original research. Though there is no reception though looking on websites there isnt actually any which I can find either. MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Thorough and well focussed
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Maybe this is picky, on the development of Sol you could put a picture of Cole like with Vanessa Gold. MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Every thing is good, so I am happy to list this as a Good Article. Congratulations! MayhemMario (talk) 18:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]